Eric Hehman
@erichehman.bsky.social
prejudice, person perception at McGill | https://prejudicemap.org
We have a new tutorial out in Social Cog methods issue, a resampling tool we made in R that basically tells you when some average is "stable" and can be used to guide data collection or test hypotheses related to variance. Quick explanation here
1/n
guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/...
1/n
guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/...
October 21, 2025 at 1:47 PM
We have a new tutorial out in Social Cog methods issue, a resampling tool we made in R that basically tells you when some average is "stable" and can be used to guide data collection or test hypotheses related to variance. Quick explanation here
1/n
guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/...
1/n
guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/...
McGill psych is hosting a panel for under rep minority folks possibly interested in attending grad school on Oct 20.
Register here: events.teams.microsoft.com/event/246051...
Register here: events.teams.microsoft.com/event/246051...
October 7, 2025 at 9:26 PM
McGill psych is hosting a panel for under rep minority folks possibly interested in attending grad school on Oct 20.
Register here: events.teams.microsoft.com/event/246051...
Register here: events.teams.microsoft.com/event/246051...
cool paper extracting spatial distance from Turkish youtube videos, concludes people walk closer to their ingroup (on sidewalks etc), non religious men avoid religious women
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
October 4, 2025 at 3:09 PM
cool paper extracting spatial distance from Turkish youtube videos, concludes people walk closer to their ingroup (on sidewalks etc), non religious men avoid religious women
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
We had a new tutorial on representational similarity analysis come out recently. Led by @xallysie.bsky.social with Ruoying Zheng and @chujunlin.bsky.social
This technique lets you compare patterns across diff types of measures (eg correlate correlation matrices), super flexible
This technique lets you compare patterns across diff types of measures (eg correlate correlation matrices), super flexible
July 7, 2025 at 12:11 PM
We had a new tutorial on representational similarity analysis come out recently. Led by @xallysie.bsky.social with Ruoying Zheng and @chujunlin.bsky.social
This technique lets you compare patterns across diff types of measures (eg correlate correlation matrices), super flexible
This technique lets you compare patterns across diff types of measures (eg correlate correlation matrices), super flexible
Appreciate your thoughts! Do find this confusing, ok going with capitalized
February 6, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Appreciate your thoughts! Do find this confusing, ok going with capitalized
Every regional bias paper talks about dangers of ecological fallacy, that relationships can be different at different levels of analysis. Here wanted to actually test to what extent this was a concern.
Can we interpret regional bias the same as individual-level? What is their relationship?
Can we interpret regional bias the same as individual-level? What is their relationship?
December 12, 2024 at 5:47 PM
Every regional bias paper talks about dangers of ecological fallacy, that relationships can be different at different levels of analysis. Here wanted to actually test to what extent this was a concern.
Can we interpret regional bias the same as individual-level? What is their relationship?
Can we interpret regional bias the same as individual-level? What is their relationship?
We have a new paper on interpreting regional attitudes out in JPSP, led by Jennifer Suliteanu @jensulite.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1037/pspa...
This is her first paper 🫶
Few comments
doi.org/10.1037/pspa...
This is her first paper 🫶
Few comments
December 12, 2024 at 5:47 PM
We have a new paper on interpreting regional attitudes out in JPSP, led by Jennifer Suliteanu @jensulite.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1037/pspa...
This is her first paper 🫶
Few comments
doi.org/10.1037/pspa...
This is her first paper 🫶
Few comments
Call for 2025 Regional Cultural Difference Conference submissions, in Vancouver from July 8-11
Details here: www.geo-psych.com
Call open until Jan 6th, 2025
We are aiming for 50-60 participants with wide array of backgrounds, at all career stages, interested in regional cultural differences. 1/n
Details here: www.geo-psych.com
Call open until Jan 6th, 2025
We are aiming for 50-60 participants with wide array of backgrounds, at all career stages, interested in regional cultural differences. 1/n
November 8, 2024 at 3:59 PM
Call for 2025 Regional Cultural Difference Conference submissions, in Vancouver from July 8-11
Details here: www.geo-psych.com
Call open until Jan 6th, 2025
We are aiming for 50-60 participants with wide array of backgrounds, at all career stages, interested in regional cultural differences. 1/n
Details here: www.geo-psych.com
Call open until Jan 6th, 2025
We are aiming for 50-60 participants with wide array of backgrounds, at all career stages, interested in regional cultural differences. 1/n
Paper led by Chloe Bracegirdle wins the SPSSI Gordon Allport award this year. A nice paper breaking down nuances between the intergroup contact effect and socialization effects: psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
November 4, 2024 at 6:36 PM
Paper led by Chloe Bracegirdle wins the SPSSI Gordon Allport award this year. A nice paper breaking down nuances between the intergroup contact effect and socialization effects: psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
Finally, person memory offering the training i need.
October 22, 2024 at 8:00 PM
Finally, person memory offering the training i need.
With SESP approaching, please remember:
October 16, 2024 at 6:21 PM
With SESP approaching, please remember:
How to evaluate theories. An impressive framework for deciding what is a better/worse (more or less useful) theory. Loved this paper
psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
August 1, 2024 at 7:52 AM
How to evaluate theories. An impressive framework for deciding what is a better/worse (more or less useful) theory. Loved this paper
psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
Great new paper: govt policy causes perceptions of support for that policy, personal endorsement of attitude. Experimental and quasi longitudinal (roe vs wade) data. Little murkier about when exactly people endorse vs. reject
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
July 30, 2024 at 1:52 AM
Great new paper: govt policy causes perceptions of support for that policy, personal endorsement of attitude. Experimental and quasi longitudinal (roe vs wade) data. Little murkier about when exactly people endorse vs. reject
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Went to a neat exhibit on him, one of his ideas was to put poor people on boat-cities for high density low income housing... which surely wouldn't have gone badly in practice
July 24, 2024 at 7:05 AM
Went to a neat exhibit on him, one of his ideas was to put poor people on boat-cities for high density low income housing... which surely wouldn't have gone badly in practice
Becca Neel will be presenting this paper at SPSP in a broader symposium on formal models if starting to think about your schedule!
January 30, 2024 at 5:46 PM
Becca Neel will be presenting this paper at SPSP in a broader symposium on formal models if starting to think about your schedule!
We reviewed field and found 32 theoretically causal factors psych knows how to measure
Over 18 studies or so, using regularization, built a parsimonious model of prejudice, resulting in above models
Regularly explain ~45-60% of the variance in individuals' prej across a bunch of diff groups
Over 18 studies or so, using regularization, built a parsimonious model of prejudice, resulting in above models
Regularly explain ~45-60% of the variance in individuals' prej across a bunch of diff groups
December 28, 2023 at 6:23 PM
We reviewed field and found 32 theoretically causal factors psych knows how to measure
Over 18 studies or so, using regularization, built a parsimonious model of prejudice, resulting in above models
Regularly explain ~45-60% of the variance in individuals' prej across a bunch of diff groups
Over 18 studies or so, using regularization, built a parsimonious model of prejudice, resulting in above models
Regularly explain ~45-60% of the variance in individuals' prej across a bunch of diff groups