Chris Saunders
@epsilon-oracle.bsky.social
Reposted by Chris Saunders
At arXiv, we are seeing submissions that consist of many short sections and bullet points rather than a fluent narrative. These submissions are more like outlines than actual papers. For those of you who play with LLMs, is this writing style produced by some of the current LLMs?
February 23, 2025 at 5:41 PM
At arXiv, we are seeing submissions that consist of many short sections and bullet points rather than a fluent narrative. These submissions are more like outlines than actual papers. For those of you who play with LLMs, is this writing style produced by some of the current LLMs?
Reposted by Chris Saunders
We just published an exciting paper. Due to the statistical flaws in validity studies, we don't know the error rates in firearms casework, i.e. the discipline doesn't have a scientific basis. @amandaluby.bsky.social @srvanderplas.bsky.social @mrosenblum.bsky.social
academic.oup.com/lpr/article/...
academic.oup.com/lpr/article/...
Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons
Abstract. Reviews conducted by the National Academy of Sciences (2009) and the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016) concluded t
academic.oup.com
December 9, 2024 at 10:00 PM
We just published an exciting paper. Due to the statistical flaws in validity studies, we don't know the error rates in firearms casework, i.e. the discipline doesn't have a scientific basis. @amandaluby.bsky.social @srvanderplas.bsky.social @mrosenblum.bsky.social
academic.oup.com/lpr/article/...
academic.oup.com/lpr/article/...