and challenges have shifted as AI becomes part of everyday clinical practice.

This dual perspective gives a unique view of both where we are now and how we got here—highlighting the growing need for ethical frameworks that keep pace with real-world innovation.
#AIethics #MedicalEthics #BioEthics

Our two-pronged approach does more than just summarize the latest (2021–2023) research on AI ethics in healthcare. By also mapping how narratives in scoping reviews from 2014 onward have evolved, we reveal how core debates, frameworks...

I worked at Notre Dame for a few years, and I have to admit that there were lounges with free coffee

Interesting to know about their reaction when they know more precisely what their salary will be

Very cool!

...and generate data, should get priority. Here we dismantle this prejudice, by unveiling the experimental dimension of bioinformatics 5/5 END

Who has the claim to the narrative of a complex project? The person who worked at the bench, or the one analyzing data? More concretely: who gets first names, and why? There is a well-documented epistemic prejudice arguing that wet lab biologists, because they do experiments... 4/5

While this may look like an academic exercise in trying to philosophically justify an unusual idea, our motivations are very political and rooted in a real problem: how do power dynamics in academic settings shape the relationship between computational biologists and 'wet lab' biologists? 3/5

We argue that computational biology is an experimental science. This is not just a provocative stance: we substantiate our claim using both theoretical and empirical arguments, through a case study in #singlecell RNA sequencing (RNA velocity) and other #genomics examples.
But why this claim? 2/5

Thanks Eran!

Can you please add me? Thanks!

Would love to be included!

Please add me!