Emanuele Ratti
emratti.bsky.social
Emanuele Ratti
@emratti.bsky.social
#philsci (AI and biology); #AIEthics data ethics. Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol. Past: Reilly Center at Notre Dame; JKU Linz. PhD: Foundations and Ethics of the Life Sciences, European School of Molecular Medicine (Milan)
and challenges have shifted as AI becomes part of everyday clinical practice.

This dual perspective gives a unique view of both where we are now and how we got here—highlighting the growing need for ethical frameworks that keep pace with real-world innovation.
#AIethics #MedicalEthics #BioEthics
May 27, 2025 at 8:53 AM
Our two-pronged approach does more than just summarize the latest (2021–2023) research on AI ethics in healthcare. By also mapping how narratives in scoping reviews from 2014 onward have evolved, we reveal how core debates, frameworks...
May 27, 2025 at 8:53 AM
I worked at Notre Dame for a few years, and I have to admit that there were lounges with free coffee
May 17, 2025 at 9:19 AM
Interesting to know about their reaction when they know more precisely what their salary will be
March 25, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Very cool!
February 15, 2025 at 1:55 PM
...and generate data, should get priority. Here we dismantle this prejudice, by unveiling the experimental dimension of bioinformatics 5/5 END
January 28, 2025 at 9:47 AM
Who has the claim to the narrative of a complex project? The person who worked at the bench, or the one analyzing data? More concretely: who gets first names, and why? There is a well-documented epistemic prejudice arguing that wet lab biologists, because they do experiments... 4/5
January 28, 2025 at 9:47 AM
While this may look like an academic exercise in trying to philosophically justify an unusual idea, our motivations are very political and rooted in a real problem: how do power dynamics in academic settings shape the relationship between computational biologists and 'wet lab' biologists? 3/5
January 28, 2025 at 9:47 AM
We argue that computational biology is an experimental science. This is not just a provocative stance: we substantiate our claim using both theoretical and empirical arguments, through a case study in #singlecell RNA sequencing (RNA velocity) and other #genomics examples.
But why this claim? 2/5
philsci-archive.pitt.edu
January 28, 2025 at 9:47 AM
Thanks Eran!
January 10, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Can you please add me? Thanks!
November 24, 2024 at 9:19 AM
Would love to be included!
November 24, 2024 at 9:13 AM
Please add me!
November 24, 2024 at 9:13 AM