un acquitrino maleodorante
@empeecee.bsky.social
*Testing.*
If I've followed you to this point I may well have liked the cut of your jib at that other place circa '09 to '20.
Naarm.
If I've followed you to this point I may well have liked the cut of your jib at that other place circa '09 to '20.
Naarm.
Goldstein HTV cards online indicate that both LAB and GRN recommended marking Daniel's box with a [2]. Not sure how much more preferencing-Daniel-over-Wilson they could have been.
May 20, 2025 at 4:07 AM
Goldstein HTV cards online indicate that both LAB and GRN recommended marking Daniel's box with a [2]. Not sure how much more preferencing-Daniel-over-Wilson they could have been.
Yeah, there is that.
May 12, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Yeah, there is that.
In what sense is the Greens senator "irrelevant"?
May 12, 2025 at 12:37 PM
In what sense is the Greens senator "irrelevant"?
They were 'destroyed' apparently. Then the senate gets but a fleeting mention in the 'parting thoughts' section...
May 11, 2025 at 12:01 AM
They were 'destroyed' apparently. Then the senate gets but a fleeting mention in the 'parting thoughts' section...
Part of me enjoys the inevitable shoehorning of long-term gripes into turgid thinkpieces on the reasons for any fluctuation in the Greens vote after every election ever.
This year has truly been a 5-star effort in terms of the ratio of column inches : swing magnitudes, at least!
This year has truly been a 5-star effort in terms of the ratio of column inches : swing magnitudes, at least!
May 10, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Part of me enjoys the inevitable shoehorning of long-term gripes into turgid thinkpieces on the reasons for any fluctuation in the Greens vote after every election ever.
This year has truly been a 5-star effort in terms of the ratio of column inches : swing magnitudes, at least!
This year has truly been a 5-star effort in terms of the ratio of column inches : swing magnitudes, at least!
He suggested "progressive people" don't.
And a "massive majority" in the lower house--while almost 2/3 of voters would have preferred someone else--possibly says more about the quirks of the electoral system than levels of public enthusiasm.
And a "massive majority" in the lower house--while almost 2/3 of voters would have preferred someone else--possibly says more about the quirks of the electoral system than levels of public enthusiasm.
May 8, 2025 at 12:39 AM
He suggested "progressive people" don't.
And a "massive majority" in the lower house--while almost 2/3 of voters would have preferred someone else--possibly says more about the quirks of the electoral system than levels of public enthusiasm.
And a "massive majority" in the lower house--while almost 2/3 of voters would have preferred someone else--possibly says more about the quirks of the electoral system than levels of public enthusiasm.
I've had somewhat similar experiences at polling places (pleasingly) but failing to draw a distinction between party volunteers and all the other voters with more normal pastimes (lol) is little kerrazy dude.
May 7, 2025 at 1:08 AM
I've had somewhat similar experiences at polling places (pleasingly) but failing to draw a distinction between party volunteers and all the other voters with more normal pastimes (lol) is little kerrazy dude.
Except that their level of support has barely changed. Looking secure again in the senate (where they've always had the most clout, let's face it) and they've heard this same "Greens have lost their way and thankfully won't exist much longer" stuff after every election of the 21st century.
May 6, 2025 at 12:17 PM
Except that their level of support has barely changed. Looking secure again in the senate (where they've always had the most clout, let's face it) and they've heard this same "Greens have lost their way and thankfully won't exist much longer" stuff after every election of the 21st century.