Perry: How do you respond to the plaintiffs' contention that any unrest, any violence is the fault of how federal agents are interacting with members of the public? Does it matter if their conduct is why they can't execute federal laws?
Hamilton: No.

Perry: DOJ's definition of rebellion would mean that
"literally all nonviolent protest” could be considered evidence of rebellion. Is that your argument?
Hamilton: The president has determined there is a danger of a rebellion, and you must defer to that finding

Beautiful!

Wtf is this title? Don't downplay or marginalize with this "critics" nonsense. "Majority See Risks..." "Public Sees Risks..." "Everyone and that goat over there sees risk..." Would all be more accurate

But it can still be concerning in terms of the costs during the attempted Ausschaltung (if I'm meeting your metaphor on its terms*), right? Either way, I so hope our better angels and principles can reappear.

Noooooooo. It's too good I caaaaannnttt

I wasn't ready to be so brutally called out...

Up the Easter eggs and sass in your footnotes?