Emanuelle Burton
banner
emanuelleburton.bsky.social
Emanuelle Burton
@emanuelleburton.bsky.social
I’m a religion scholar who teaches ethics to computer science majors, talks about the books I have read, and ignores the books I want to read and watches tv instead

Computing & Technology Ethics: Engaging through Science Fiction now out from MIT Press
We had a really good paper on overlearning by search models at AIES this year! ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AI...
Emergent AI Surveillance: Overlearned Person Re-Identification and Its Mitigation in Law Enforcement Context | Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
ojs.aaai.org
November 13, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Reposted by Emanuelle Burton
I do, of course, have a paragraph from "Why We Fear AI" for this
November 11, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Oh that sounds so good! We watched BODKIN on the strength of an old-fashioned recommendation algorithm (a human friend told us that it was similar and they’d liked it) but it was only ok. We’ll give BS a try!
November 12, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Aaaaaaaa FINALLY
November 12, 2025 at 4:47 PM
…which is that the fantasy of objective knowledge is not benign: it gives you permission to launder your own founding premises into some kind of universal truth, and the whole project of research can get remade into a search for the method that gives you plausible cover for that laundering
November 7, 2025 at 2:37 PM
I ground my whole approach to teaching ethics (to CS students) in epistemology, bc I think anyone working with data & information needs to understand that those things are created & constructed rather than found in some kind of natural state, but this is the other reason I think it’s so important…
November 7, 2025 at 2:34 PM
And for some strange reason — who can say, really — isolating and identifying the kinds of racism that are acceptable for Science Knowers is a very high priority research project
November 7, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Yeah there’s an alarmingly large number of people who agree that racism is bad if it’s rooted in bias (ie human weakness & limitation), but that if you ground it in “pure data” (heavy scare quotes) it’s somehow legitimate
November 7, 2025 at 2:29 PM
This reminds me of when some right-wing commentator — I want to say Dinesh D’Souza? — said smugly in the mid-aughts that queer people had the exact same marriage rights as everyone else, which is to say the right to marry a person of the opposite sex.
November 7, 2025 at 1:52 AM
It’s going to be whack-a-mole as long as people in AI understand the barriers to credible phrenology as a data-and-implementation problem rather than a “that’s just racism in a scientific bow tie” problem
November 6, 2025 at 9:44 PM
I want to say “are we really doing this again” except we’ve never stopped doing this
November 6, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Well, we’re glad to have you in Chicago
November 5, 2025 at 4:26 AM
I’ve spent almost 25 years waiting for Georgian food to be the next big thing and it still hasn’t quite happened, and now you too understand why this is a travesty!
October 29, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Reposted by Emanuelle Burton
I remember Joshua Meyrowitz saying that TV, as a medium, supplies you with an interpretation of the events you're seeing, as you're seeing them; TikTok seems like TV on steroids, in that respect. You can't learn to chew if mama bird chews your food for you!
September 29, 2025 at 11:52 AM
you can also donate to local abortion funds, which mostly do direct service and care work: abortionfunds.org
Homepage - National Network of Abortion Funds
Our network of nearly 100 abortion funds builds power for abortion access. Find a fund, get support, donate, and join campaigns with NNAF.
abortionfunds.org
September 11, 2025 at 9:45 PM