And it's viral. Of course.

I am clarifying joke of source of course of course

Kidnapper got spit on himself? Oh no.

What's sad is she thinks this makes Trump look better bc she's saying he thinks the same way

Jane Doe v Trump and Epstein 2016 NYC it was on PACER, here's where a Saint bought and collected the files so you can read them all

thememoryhole2.org/blog/doe-v-t...

Peace, man. Edibles help some with the patience adjust to traumatic experiences
No offense but I'm old, seen some things, and yet this past year was trau- matic, and worse deliberate harm done. You track the suicides this upcoming year, alright? Ones brought to it by economy, policy? Ok

Trump & ICE mostly aren't supposed to be within 1 mile of children

That's bc you want to claim Dems that were not complicit were, to distract from GOP that firmly support pedos. But I've been following the Epstein thing since 2015.
This was GMs phone list, from the original, which was in Gawker, redacted, in 2015, bc Trump's suspicious involvement was ALREADY known

Spoilers: The call came from inside the house. And the reason we know about it is bc Thiel sued for repayment.

This is actually the most *interesting* part of the saga and has been deep dived on in other articles and stories. Go get your 🍿.

Look if the article includes how Thiel sued Trump when they didn't repay his money

The impeachment vote passed the House, it went dead in the water in the Senate

Thiel knows by now Trump doesn't pay his contractors unless they sue him

I know about the sham given reason but then Thiel requested repayment from Trump GOP of the millions he spent for his lawyers, was turned down so had a LAWSUIT against the Trump GOP for the money, spilling the beans.

Thiel had Gawker shut down for Trump, afraid of Epstein stories coming out. I still saw their articles on him, Trump, Prince Andrew, and Epstein but a lot of people didn't. NYT never mentioned Jane Doe v Trump and Epstein at all in 2015-6 when that would have been in the top five pages if HRC right?

Liz Cheney was a R. GOPedos ( you can give an exception to LC on that, if you like) had the majority and almost no one was breaking ranks. Indictment/ removal requires lots of votes.

NYT wasn't just complicit in covering up for Trump. Deceptive to near treasonous is more towards the truth.

That's not Rep. Raskin's fault though, the GOP voted down having witness testimonies at the public impeachment trials and for for putting Trump on the stand or asking him to resign. Trump was later admitted to been seen guilty by the same Rs who publically supported the claim it was a hoax.

The two things are not the same are they?