Elmar Haneveld
@elmarhaneveld.bsky.social
Co-Founder of CreateNew. Design System & Tokens Specialist at Air France KLM
Cool
Say hello to responsive, adaptable shapes in CSS with the new shape() function!
Instead of static SVG paths in clip-path, shape() allows you to define scalable, flexible shapes with familiar CSS units, variables, and even calc().
Learn more on the WebKit blog post.
webkit.org/blog/16794/t...
Instead of static SVG paths in clip-path, shape() allows you to define scalable, flexible shapes with familiar CSS units, variables, and even calc().
Learn more on the WebKit blog post.
webkit.org/blog/16794/t...
The CSS shape() function
Shapes are an important aspect of graphic design.
webkit.org
April 16, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Cool
Not a shocker. Although I wonder if they also looked into the positive effects. During coding I learn a lot from AI.
“Another paper, published last year, unearthed a distressing link between students who heavily relied on ChatGPT and memory loss and tanking grades.”
futurism.com/cognitive-de...
“Another paper, published last year, unearthed a distressing link between students who heavily relied on ChatGPT and memory loss and tanking grades.”
futurism.com/cognitive-de...
Man Alarmed as His Cognitive Skills Decay After Outsourcing Them to AI
Sam Schechner, a tech reporter, was alarmed when he realized that he was using ChatGPT to do stuff as simple as texting his friends.
futurism.com
April 6, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Not a shocker. Although I wonder if they also looked into the positive effects. During coding I learn a lot from AI.
“Another paper, published last year, unearthed a distressing link between students who heavily relied on ChatGPT and memory loss and tanking grades.”
futurism.com/cognitive-de...
“Another paper, published last year, unearthed a distressing link between students who heavily relied on ChatGPT and memory loss and tanking grades.”
futurism.com/cognitive-de...
Exactly this.
I’ve been doing a bunch of coding over the past few days with claude-3.7-sonnet MAX in Agent mode in Cursor. It’s been amazing. It’s like having a junior dev who works fast, knows a lot for its experience level, gets a lot right (and a lot wrong too), but is always willing to go back and try again.
March 23, 2025 at 8:40 AM
Exactly this.
Yesss
March 5, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Yesss
Reposted by Elmar Haneveld
I don't think the robots are taking over. I think the men who play with toys have taken over, and if we don't take the toys out of their hands, we're fools.
—Ray Bradbury
—Ray Bradbury
February 5, 2025 at 3:13 PM
I don't think the robots are taking over. I think the men who play with toys have taken over, and if we don't take the toys out of their hands, we're fools.
—Ray Bradbury
—Ray Bradbury
Perhaps fix this little App Icon issue @netflix.com? 👌
February 3, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Perhaps fix this little App Icon issue @netflix.com? 👌
Now I have to fake edit the Vrank.app code, publish a new version while I really don’t have any reason to.
Testers like the app, dark mode works, widgets work, in app purchase works, in-car version works, the content have no spelling errors.
End of rant.
@googledevs.bsky.social
Testers like the app, dark mode works, widgets work, in app purchase works, in-car version works, the content have no spelling errors.
End of rant.
@googledevs.bsky.social
Vrank, vragen om een goed gesprek
Vrank.app
February 1, 2025 at 12:31 PM
Now I have to fake edit the Vrank.app code, publish a new version while I really don’t have any reason to.
Testers like the app, dark mode works, widgets work, in app purchase works, in-car version works, the content have no spelling errors.
End of rant.
@googledevs.bsky.social
Testers like the app, dark mode works, widgets work, in app purchase works, in-car version works, the content have no spelling errors.
End of rant.
@googledevs.bsky.social
Well, won’t be making another app for Android again. The approval process does not make any sense! Understand they want better quality but this is simply insane.
12 testers? Check.
Feedback from testers? Check. App is bug free? Check.
Google: “App requires more testing” 🤯 Why? It all works!
12 testers? Check.
Feedback from testers? Check. App is bug free? Check.
Google: “App requires more testing” 🤯 Why? It all works!
February 1, 2025 at 12:25 PM
Well, won’t be making another app for Android again. The approval process does not make any sense! Understand they want better quality but this is simply insane.
12 testers? Check.
Feedback from testers? Check. App is bug free? Check.
Google: “App requires more testing” 🤯 Why? It all works!
12 testers? Check.
Feedback from testers? Check. App is bug free? Check.
Google: “App requires more testing” 🤯 Why? It all works!
Working with AI is like: “Wow, this is amazing! Unbelievable it got the job don… Why have I lost half the code I worked on?”
a man in a grey sweater is asking why would you do that
ALT: a man in a grey sweater is asking why would you do that
media.tenor.com
January 24, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Working with AI is like: “Wow, this is amazing! Unbelievable it got the job don… Why have I lost half the code I worked on?”