mis-disinformation, dark patterns, fraud (as we saw with Reuter's piece last week that Meta makes billions from that), online risk and harms and user behaviours. It's also a good idea to regulate that before it will spread more widely to AI chatbots

As I mentioned in the panel, I think most of the online harms issues Ofcom is dealing with comes down to the business model. Regulators have been avoiding touching this, but it all boils down to that ->

Was fab to see my brilliant colleague Stephanie Alice Baker who is doing important work on health influencers, my brilliant collaborator Elena Musi watch this space for our new work on AI literacy 😉 & my PhD student Liv Owens who is doing brilliant work on how families make sense of dataveillance ->

I am so happy to see better connections between regulators and academics, we can benefit so much by working closely together and I'm excited to see that there is such appetite for that! ->

Exactly 😈

And with it she shows how unique she is in the current pop world, not formulaic, original and fabulous ( Yes, Rosalia as well but different)
youtu.be/tG1HKY6Jwas?...

I live in London so this is perfect thank you!

I need to know where you got those amazing earrings! Please 🙏 😍

😆 which other embassies? Maybe I missed something!

Ultimately, governments can spend millions on media and AI literacy programs but if they don't address the surveillance adtech business model they are a drop in the ocean.

Was fabulous to meet other @milalliance.bsky.social and friends Jane Secker and Stephane Goldstein!

The lack of willingness to regulate this business model leads to mis- and dis-information, fraud and scam which as we saw last week from Reuters' @jeffhorwitz.bsky.social piece
they make billions from, so why would they stop? ->
www.reuters.com/investigatio...