that one was a bit of a parsing nightmare 🐙
that one was a bit of a parsing nightmare 🐙
so, it seems to me that when you check if the next range's min is less than the current range's max, you don't check if the next max is actually greater than the current max, meaning you could end up shrinking the range instead of growing it. if a range is wholly inside another one...
so, it seems to me that when you check if the next range's min is less than the current range's max, you don't check if the next max is actually greater than the current max, meaning you could end up shrinking the range instead of growing it. if a range is wholly inside another one...
I haven't tried running your code myself yet, but I do see a potential issue in the consolidate ranges function if your open to suggestions later. just lmk, but no rush #chill
I haven't tried running your code myself yet, but I do see a potential issue in the consolidate ranges function if your open to suggestions later. just lmk, but no rush #chill
Maybe next year you can at least get to a "don't hate" feeling with them 😅
Maybe next year you can at least get to a "don't hate" feeling with them 😅
That was some kind of string parsing that had to happen to get to the answer. Whew...
That was some kind of string parsing that had to happen to get to the answer. Whew...