Chief Naming Officer
@egulias.bsky.social
Reposted by Chief Naming Officer
Just abandon the LC model. It was always crap to begin with. The most important skills you want from a developer aren't even tested in LC style evaluation. With LLMs as a tool it's more meaningless than ever.
August 30, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Just abandon the LC model. It was always crap to begin with. The most important skills you want from a developer aren't even tested in LC style evaluation. With LLMs as a tool it's more meaningless than ever.
Reposted by Chief Naming Officer
- Maintenance
- Migrations
- Real-world edge cases
- Non-functional requirements: eg latency, performance, cost of operations, security
- Compliance
- Tech debt
... and most importantly: people!! (collaboration, conflicts, ownership etc etc)
- Migrations
- Real-world edge cases
- Non-functional requirements: eg latency, performance, cost of operations, security
- Compliance
- Tech debt
... and most importantly: people!! (collaboration, conflicts, ownership etc etc)
May 30, 2025 at 1:26 PM
- Maintenance
- Migrations
- Real-world edge cases
- Non-functional requirements: eg latency, performance, cost of operations, security
- Compliance
- Tech debt
... and most importantly: people!! (collaboration, conflicts, ownership etc etc)
- Migrations
- Real-world edge cases
- Non-functional requirements: eg latency, performance, cost of operations, security
- Compliance
- Tech debt
... and most importantly: people!! (collaboration, conflicts, ownership etc etc)
No need to be large. Small startup here. 18 months code base (started before AI coding agents were good).
Super useful for tooling and new stuff.
Marginal on existing.
However, it still boost productivity the combo w/ generative (e.g debugging & questions) & writing in different langs.
Super useful for tooling and new stuff.
Marginal on existing.
However, it still boost productivity the combo w/ generative (e.g debugging & questions) & writing in different langs.
May 29, 2025 at 8:32 AM
No need to be large. Small startup here. 18 months code base (started before AI coding agents were good).
Super useful for tooling and new stuff.
Marginal on existing.
However, it still boost productivity the combo w/ generative (e.g debugging & questions) & writing in different langs.
Super useful for tooling and new stuff.
Marginal on existing.
However, it still boost productivity the combo w/ generative (e.g debugging & questions) & writing in different langs.
Reposted by Chief Naming Officer
An example: a large tech company (thousands of devs) got a Cursor license for all devs to use.
They checked in a few months later, and ~half the devs stopped using it. Just wasn't as useful *inside the company* This is a "top" tech co!
From newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/microsoft-...
They checked in a few months later, and ~half the devs stopped using it. Just wasn't as useful *inside the company* This is a "top" tech co!
From newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/microsoft-...
May 28, 2025 at 1:40 PM
An example: a large tech company (thousands of devs) got a Cursor license for all devs to use.
They checked in a few months later, and ~half the devs stopped using it. Just wasn't as useful *inside the company* This is a "top" tech co!
From newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/microsoft-...
They checked in a few months later, and ~half the devs stopped using it. Just wasn't as useful *inside the company* This is a "top" tech co!
From newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/microsoft-...
Habrán reutilizado el código fuente del de MS-DOS? 😂
May 21, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Habrán reutilizado el código fuente del de MS-DOS? 😂