Effle
@effle.bsky.social
I think these tables are directionally correct.
November 20, 2025 at 3:59 PM
I think these tables are directionally correct.
The dude lived the 70s/early 80s.
November 17, 2025 at 3:30 AM
The dude lived the 70s/early 80s.
Imagine filing a lawsuit to avoid feeding hungry people with other people’s money.
Oh, but I’m sure he loves and cares about *you*.
Oh, but I’m sure he loves and cares about *you*.
November 7, 2025 at 4:35 PM
Imagine filing a lawsuit to avoid feeding hungry people with other people’s money.
Oh, but I’m sure he loves and cares about *you*.
Oh, but I’m sure he loves and cares about *you*.
He continues to punish Americans with inflation he refuses to take the pain to control. That’s the data.
November 5, 2025 at 9:51 PM
He continues to punish Americans with inflation he refuses to take the pain to control. That’s the data.
Technology capital projects have been the largest beneficiary of what appears to be underpriced corporate credit risk—the same conditions we saw forming in prior periods like 1997-99 and 2005-7 and 2022. We know how these all ended, with 2022 less severe because fed let inflation run higher longer.
October 31, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Technology capital projects have been the largest beneficiary of what appears to be underpriced corporate credit risk—the same conditions we saw forming in prior periods like 1997-99 and 2005-7 and 2022. We know how these all ended, with 2022 less severe because fed let inflation run higher longer.
Ample evidence exists showing the relationship between risk appetite and monetary policy, even if we haven’t studied the transmission mechanisms sufficiently. Technology has just positioned itself through (often BS) narrative construction to be the biggest beneficiary of the risk taking.
October 31, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Ample evidence exists showing the relationship between risk appetite and monetary policy, even if we haven’t studied the transmission mechanisms sufficiently. Technology has just positioned itself through (often BS) narrative construction to be the biggest beneficiary of the risk taking.
Finally, the 14th Amendment tried to avoid EXACTLY what’s happening now with party spirit running high...
October 24, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Finally, the 14th Amendment tried to avoid EXACTLY what’s happening now with party spirit running high...
Further, one of the reasons birthright citizenship was codified with the very high bar of a Constitutional Amendment was to clearly make it the law of the land. Want to end birthright citizenship? Pass a Constitutional Amendment.
October 24, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Further, one of the reasons birthright citizenship was codified with the very high bar of a Constitutional Amendment was to clearly make it the law of the land. Want to end birthright citizenship? Pass a Constitutional Amendment.
Ironically, if these dimwits would bother to read the Senate debates during the ratification of the 14th Amendment (1866) and note how the Senator from CA said the children of Chinese immigrants were already clearly citizens (that was 10% of Californians at the time, btw), they’d know how they felt.
October 24, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Ironically, if these dimwits would bother to read the Senate debates during the ratification of the 14th Amendment (1866) and note how the Senator from CA said the children of Chinese immigrants were already clearly citizens (that was 10% of Californians at the time, btw), they’d know how they felt.
“Cool” says everyone pushing the Fed to cut anyway.
October 24, 2025 at 6:06 PM
“Cool” says everyone pushing the Fed to cut anyway.
Liquidity and leverage. Nothing else (really) matters.
October 23, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Liquidity and leverage. Nothing else (really) matters.
Also sounds like he’s reminding everyone we all paid for rebuilding the capitol building.
October 15, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Also sounds like he’s reminding everyone we all paid for rebuilding the capitol building.
Starting to think Musk doesn’t like Altman because he’s taking the same game to another level.
October 6, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Starting to think Musk doesn’t like Altman because he’s taking the same game to another level.
No one seems to want to talk about how shareholders would already own ALL of xAI in any normal world. It was a corporate opportunity for Tesla that was diverted by the CEO to his own interest in violation of the fiduciary duty of Loyalty (both him and the complicit board).
September 17, 2025 at 2:06 AM
No one seems to want to talk about how shareholders would already own ALL of xAI in any normal world. It was a corporate opportunity for Tesla that was diverted by the CEO to his own interest in violation of the fiduciary duty of Loyalty (both him and the complicit board).
It’s not a difficult process. Would Bondi consider this hate speech? Or do I just need to understand the broader context, and that it isn’t racist if I do?
September 16, 2025 at 7:42 PM
It’s not a difficult process. Would Bondi consider this hate speech? Or do I just need to understand the broader context, and that it isn’t racist if I do?
We ate a lot of cookies.
September 2, 2025 at 5:04 PM
We ate a lot of cookies.
Hard to deny looking like the Nazi autocratic playbook.
August 27, 2025 at 2:51 AM
Hard to deny looking like the Nazi autocratic playbook.
