Jess Edwards
edwardsjk.bsky.social
Jess Edwards
@edwardsjk.bsky.social
Epidemiologist; 🚲🏔️
Sounds so cute!
November 5, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Yes, descriptive studies can compare groups. (Different from comparing actions, as in causal studies).
March 5, 2025 at 3:39 AM
I know this is beside the point and not the biggest problem here, but ... *don't*
February 25, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Congratulations!
February 24, 2025 at 12:56 PM
No? But I’d love to learn more. Can you share details?
January 29, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Thanks! I think I’m sorted out for now but hope our paths cross in the future!
January 28, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Thanks!

👋 @bikeshopgirl.bsky.social!! Any recs on CH/Carrboro area shops that do good work on e-cargo bikes?
January 18, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Sounds lovely. Very jealous of your bike accessibility but I would miss the hills!
January 18, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Also! I didn't think i would want an e-bike. But, the bike is already heavy, and once loaded with kids/stuff it is really nice to have extra power on the hills, especially when commuting (ie times it is less appropriate to show up drenched in sweat).
January 17, 2025 at 9:22 PM
I'd try to ride as many as possible to get a sense of what you want. I did not take this advice though (not many places to try them around here - or if there are obviously I don't know about them). But I love my Xtracycle.
January 17, 2025 at 9:22 PM
(Many months ago I asked this question on the Other Site, but then left that site before recording the answers. Apologies to anyone I inadvertently ignored!)
January 17, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Part of this will likely depend on making that block of weaver st a viable option for cycling to work and school (I.e. not option 1 which requires cyclists to dismount).
January 15, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Burn it down!!
January 10, 2025 at 9:12 PM
I mean, if we want the ideal we would get to see all potential outcomes for everyone. Since we can’t do that under current physical laws, we randomize for exchangeability. But I wouldn’t call that ideal!
January 10, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Obviously “everyone” means “the entire target population”. Not everyone in The Whole World because that would be unrealistic.
January 10, 2025 at 2:29 PM
If we want “ideal”: 1) give everyone the first intervention and perfectly measure outcomes on everyone, and then 2) go back in time to give everyone the other intervention and perfectly measure their outcomes again, and then 3) compare.
January 10, 2025 at 2:28 PM
And I see you were humble about it ;)
December 26, 2024 at 1:03 AM
Ahem, at least 2.
December 20, 2024 at 5:18 PM
There is at least 1 in Carrboro. Will try to get a photo on my next ride by
December 20, 2024 at 4:50 PM