Ed Donnellan
banner
eddonnellan.bsky.social
Ed Donnellan
@eddonnellan.bsky.social
Postdoc at Warwick Uni. Keen primate. Interested in growing things and occasionally playing instruments. Borderline utility cyclist
It only just about works if you say it out loud
November 4, 2025 at 8:11 PM
"I get really frustrated when I can't think of the superfamily containing Hylobatidae, Pongidae and Hominidae."

"Hominoid."

"Yeah so am I."
November 4, 2025 at 8:10 PM
These are absolutely fantastic. Only got the slightest glimpse the other day
September 25, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Conclave 2: Pope in the City
May 9, 2025 at 12:22 PM
Weird it wasn't a Polar Bus Replacement
January 10, 2025 at 10:27 PM
How soon is now
November 30, 2024 at 10:55 PM
Sounds perfect! "Oh no, it's a two-day hike to reply to that email".
November 27, 2024 at 3:30 PM
Binoculars?
November 27, 2024 at 3:12 PM
link.springer.com/article/10.3...
This paper creates a combined accuracy and RT measure (SRT) from Flanker tasks, but the raw data includes them separately... Might be nice to compare ddm against their findings.. (OK I'll stop)
Inconsistent flanker congruency effects across stimulus types and age groups: A cautionary tale - Behavior Research Methods
The flanker task is a common measure of selective attention and response competition across populations, age groups, and experiential contexts. Adapting it for different uses often involves changing m...
link.springer.com
November 12, 2024 at 10:11 AM
In about 2 years we should have some flanker data from ~95 four year olds... So hold tight
November 12, 2024 at 7:19 AM
Sounds like they should be trying to find flanker data then! Got to be some open data out there (probably best from kids so there's good variability in accuracy and RTs)
November 11, 2024 at 10:04 PM
Ah yes - correct. On No-Go trials you only get RTs for incorrect
November 11, 2024 at 8:11 PM
Caveat - actually participants were pretty accurate, so may not be what you're looking for - though there's some variation in the RTs.
November 11, 2024 at 4:19 PM
n=564, 50 trials. Loads of other variables you could use as IVs in there too. Let me know if you want me to explain the data structure...
November 11, 2024 at 4:18 PM
You could try the data accompanying our Psych Methods paper (osf.io/g7nbw/). There's a Go/No-Go task (described here under "Reaction Time Experiments" psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...) - which you can treat as a binary response (correct or not) with RTs.
Random item slope regression
Hosted on the Open Science Framework
osf.io
November 11, 2024 at 4:18 PM