Ece Kuru
@ecekuru.bsky.social
PhD Student in Computational Neurophysiology - Institute for Theoretical Biology at HU Berlin
Trying to stay biophysical. Proud former electrophysiologist.
(she/her)
Trying to stay biophysical. Proud former electrophysiologist.
(she/her)
Also pulled the classic: put a list of relevant phenomena I can think of in 5 minutes and combine it with random images after googling "temperature+biophysics". 😌
January 3, 2025 at 9:42 AM
Also pulled the classic: put a list of relevant phenomena I can think of in 5 minutes and combine it with random images after googling "temperature+biophysics". 😌
LSP gives you at least the warning "Type checking disabled in functions without return type", which you should listen to! Never trust the python interpreter over LSP!
And just because you don't use type hints, don't think their existence can't break your code the wrong way.
And just because you don't use type hints, don't think their existence can't break your code the wrong way.
November 30, 2024 at 10:59 AM
LSP gives you at least the warning "Type checking disabled in functions without return type", which you should listen to! Never trust the python interpreter over LSP!
And just because you don't use type hints, don't think their existence can't break your code the wrong way.
And just because you don't use type hints, don't think their existence can't break your code the wrong way.
So why is this happening? It's because python interpreter thinks you were meaning to use a type hint there. It is however not checking type hints in functions without return type, so one could expect an error. But instead it just... skips that line.
November 30, 2024 at 10:59 AM
So why is this happening? It's because python interpreter thinks you were meaning to use a type hint there. It is however not checking type hints in functions without return type, so one could expect an error. But instead it just... skips that line.