@eat-lots-of-meat.bsky.social
With the 8 D/I Senators voting for the CR, is it possible to know their next steps? At the end of Jan 2026, likely another bill is needed to fund the gov, and can be filibustered right? ACA credit not granted, will they cave in again?
What's done is done. Maybe plan and see if it'll happen again.
What's done is done. Maybe plan and see if it'll happen again.
November 13, 2025 at 4:19 AM
With the 8 D/I Senators voting for the CR, is it possible to know their next steps? At the end of Jan 2026, likely another bill is needed to fund the gov, and can be filibustered right? ACA credit not granted, will they cave in again?
What's done is done. Maybe plan and see if it'll happen again.
What's done is done. Maybe plan and see if it'll happen again.
不过话说回来，杨-米尔斯和麦克斯韦不是同一类东西么。。。
October 22, 2025 at 2:51 AM
不过话说回来，杨-米尔斯和麦克斯韦不是同一类东西么。。。
Trump doesn't know how, nor does he want to do the right thing. He is just an opportunist.
The entire Europe, plus Japan etc, are slightly turning against Israel. If the tide falls flat, Trump will easily sway back.
Trump doesn't put serious effort in anything, unless it's personal for him.
The entire Europe, plus Japan etc, are slightly turning against Israel. If the tide falls flat, Trump will easily sway back.
Trump doesn't put serious effort in anything, unless it's personal for him.
October 7, 2025 at 4:26 AM
Trump doesn't know how, nor does he want to do the right thing. He is just an opportunist.
The entire Europe, plus Japan etc, are slightly turning against Israel. If the tide falls flat, Trump will easily sway back.
Trump doesn't put serious effort in anything, unless it's personal for him.
The entire Europe, plus Japan etc, are slightly turning against Israel. If the tide falls flat, Trump will easily sway back.
Trump doesn't put serious effort in anything, unless it's personal for him.
州立大学那个算政府行为了吧？可以告违反宪法第一修正案吧。
September 13, 2025 at 4:15 AM
州立大学那个算政府行为了吧？可以告违反宪法第一修正案吧。
这idiom还真不知道。直接Google告诉我
"something is someone's to lose" means that a person is in such a dominant position that they are expected to succeed, and the only way they could fail is by making a mistake themselves. ...
而且先说"the Democrat"，至于它指代的是谁，得读到后面的Harris才知道，感觉文绉绉的，故意嘲讽我是个文盲。
"something is someone's to lose" means that a person is in such a dominant position that they are expected to succeed, and the only way they could fail is by making a mistake themselves. ...
而且先说"the Democrat"，至于它指代的是谁，得读到后面的Harris才知道，感觉文绉绉的，故意嘲讽我是个文盲。
September 10, 2025 at 10:55 PM
这idiom还真不知道。直接Google告诉我
"something is someone's to lose" means that a person is in such a dominant position that they are expected to succeed, and the only way they could fail is by making a mistake themselves. ...
而且先说"the Democrat"，至于它指代的是谁，得读到后面的Harris才知道，感觉文绉绉的，故意嘲讽我是个文盲。
"something is someone's to lose" means that a person is in such a dominant position that they are expected to succeed, and the only way they could fail is by making a mistake themselves. ...
而且先说"the Democrat"，至于它指代的是谁，得读到后面的Harris才知道，感觉文绉绉的，故意嘲讽我是个文盲。
PBS说是有两家铁路的公司想合并，这个委员会可能会阻止，所以就把委员开除了。
August 29, 2025 at 2:15 AM
PBS说是有两家铁路的公司想合并，这个委员会可能会阻止，所以就把委员开除了。
之前看方帖提过，犹他州在经济上对联邦贡献是正的。这在红州里也少有。
August 28, 2025 at 4:19 AM
之前看方帖提过，犹他州在经济上对联邦贡献是正的。这在红州里也少有。
这个有例子么？我没搜到。
我倒是听过一些诺贝尔奖得主得奖之后不甘寂寞，跑去做伪科学，包括化学和生物的获奖者。数学家里，也听过像Michael Atiyah这样的大神晚年开始胡说八道的。
我倒是听过一些诺贝尔奖得主得奖之后不甘寂寞，跑去做伪科学，包括化学和生物的获奖者。数学家里，也听过像Michael Atiyah这样的大神晚年开始胡说八道的。
August 26, 2025 at 5:53 AM
这个有例子么？我没搜到。
我倒是听过一些诺贝尔奖得主得奖之后不甘寂寞，跑去做伪科学，包括化学和生物的获奖者。数学家里，也听过像Michael Atiyah这样的大神晚年开始胡说八道的。
我倒是听过一些诺贝尔奖得主得奖之后不甘寂寞，跑去做伪科学，包括化学和生物的获奖者。数学家里，也听过像Michael Atiyah这样的大神晚年开始胡说八道的。
从对他的宣传来看，就是妄想、造神。那些传奇故事即便是真的，也应该当作无关痛痒的事情。拿来说他神，实在捕风捉影，带坏风气。
话说回来，他的那个结果确实相当不错。虽没解决孪生素数猜想，但那是0到1的突破。查了下，他得了一些麦克阿瑟奖之类的，不过这些奖确实不出名。
又查了下Abel奖。好多获奖者，一来是在某个领域有全面贡献，不像他是一个单独的结果（尽管重要）。另外那些人好多的贡献都是数十年前做出的。即便他几十年之后（Abel奖可以死后获得）也没得奖，也不说明他的结果不重要。另外一个大奖，Wolf奖，情况也类似。
总之这个网友说他单项结果重要，没错。比陶强么？我没能力判断。是不是神？当然不是。
话说回来，他的那个结果确实相当不错。虽没解决孪生素数猜想，但那是0到1的突破。查了下，他得了一些麦克阿瑟奖之类的，不过这些奖确实不出名。
又查了下Abel奖。好多获奖者，一来是在某个领域有全面贡献，不像他是一个单独的结果（尽管重要）。另外那些人好多的贡献都是数十年前做出的。即便他几十年之后（Abel奖可以死后获得）也没得奖，也不说明他的结果不重要。另外一个大奖，Wolf奖，情况也类似。
总之这个网友说他单项结果重要，没错。比陶强么？我没能力判断。是不是神？当然不是。
August 24, 2025 at 5:59 AM
从对他的宣传来看，就是妄想、造神。那些传奇故事即便是真的，也应该当作无关痛痒的事情。拿来说他神，实在捕风捉影，带坏风气。
话说回来，他的那个结果确实相当不错。虽没解决孪生素数猜想，但那是0到1的突破。查了下，他得了一些麦克阿瑟奖之类的，不过这些奖确实不出名。
又查了下Abel奖。好多获奖者，一来是在某个领域有全面贡献，不像他是一个单独的结果（尽管重要）。另外那些人好多的贡献都是数十年前做出的。即便他几十年之后（Abel奖可以死后获得）也没得奖，也不说明他的结果不重要。另外一个大奖，Wolf奖，情况也类似。
总之这个网友说他单项结果重要，没错。比陶强么？我没能力判断。是不是神？当然不是。
话说回来，他的那个结果确实相当不错。虽没解决孪生素数猜想，但那是0到1的突破。查了下，他得了一些麦克阿瑟奖之类的，不过这些奖确实不出名。
又查了下Abel奖。好多获奖者，一来是在某个领域有全面贡献，不像他是一个单独的结果（尽管重要）。另外那些人好多的贡献都是数十年前做出的。即便他几十年之后（Abel奖可以死后获得）也没得奖，也不说明他的结果不重要。另外一个大奖，Wolf奖，情况也类似。
总之这个网友说他单项结果重要，没错。比陶强么？我没能力判断。是不是神？当然不是。
AI给我的回答指向了这个
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_Co...
www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news...
Sonoma和Napa两个郡都投给了哈里斯。
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_Co...
www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news...
Sonoma和Napa两个郡都投给了哈里斯。
Wine Country - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
August 10, 2025 at 4:04 AM
AI给我的回答指向了这个
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_Co...
www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news...
Sonoma和Napa两个郡都投给了哈里斯。
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_Co...
www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news...
Sonoma和Napa两个郡都投给了哈里斯。
说的是出轨(adultery)。圣经理由好像是专门指这种，而且专门用来说离婚。适用于不少共和党人。
July 11, 2025 at 1:34 AM
说的是出轨(adultery)。圣经理由好像是专门指这种，而且专门用来说离婚。适用于不少共和党人。
搜了下，中国网上还真有卖20元一公斤的铬黄粉。而英文AI告诉我这么便宜几乎不可能。
另外所谓的那个地下水污染的说法，应该可以测测当地野生动物或者流浪猫的铅含量吧，没超标的话就打脸。
另外所谓的那个地下水污染的说法，应该可以测测当地野生动物或者流浪猫的铅含量吧，没超标的话就打脸。
July 10, 2025 at 6:50 AM
搜了下，中国网上还真有卖20元一公斤的铬黄粉。而英文AI告诉我这么便宜几乎不可能。
另外所谓的那个地下水污染的说法，应该可以测测当地野生动物或者流浪猫的铅含量吧，没超标的话就打脸。
另外所谓的那个地下水污染的说法，应该可以测测当地野生动物或者流浪猫的铅含量吧，没超标的话就打脸。
Where is the contempt case ruled by Justice Boasberg? It has been stayed by the Circuit Court for 2 months. Any plan to file motion to expedite or whatever?
June 21, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Where is the contempt case ruled by Justice Boasberg? It has been stayed by the Circuit Court for 2 months. Any plan to file motion to expedite or whatever?
不过如果真的这么做了，别人吐口水警察就可以开枪的话，那警察用胡椒喷雾的时候，被喷的人也就有理由朝警察开枪了吧。
June 10, 2025 at 1:31 AM
不过如果真的这么做了，别人吐口水警察就可以开枪的话，那警察用胡椒喷雾的时候，被喷的人也就有理由朝警察开枪了吧。
AI说
"The Federal Supremacy Clause does not mean federal agencies are above the law or federal court orders"
"If a federal court has ruled the arrests cannot be made, and local police observe federal agents acting in direct violation of that, then it becomes legally complicated."
就很让人泄气，不能直接干他们。。。
"The Federal Supremacy Clause does not mean federal agencies are above the law or federal court orders"
"If a federal court has ruled the arrests cannot be made, and local police observe federal agents acting in direct violation of that, then it becomes legally complicated."
就很让人泄气，不能直接干他们。。。
May 11, 2025 at 4:28 AM
AI说
"The Federal Supremacy Clause does not mean federal agencies are above the law or federal court orders"
"If a federal court has ruled the arrests cannot be made, and local police observe federal agents acting in direct violation of that, then it becomes legally complicated."
就很让人泄气，不能直接干他们。。。
"The Federal Supremacy Clause does not mean federal agencies are above the law or federal court orders"
"If a federal court has ruled the arrests cannot be made, and local police observe federal agents acting in direct violation of that, then it becomes legally complicated."
就很让人泄气，不能直接干他们。。。
也许是族裔和信仰方面的歧视吧。这次绑架到国外的美国公民幼儿，说母亲是洪都拉斯来的，之前的那个Juan Garcia Abrego，名字是拉美裔。也没见绑一个名字叫Donald的。
April 28, 2025 at 5:41 AM
也许是族裔和信仰方面的歧视吧。这次绑架到国外的美国公民幼儿，说母亲是洪都拉斯来的，之前的那个Juan Garcia Abrego，名字是拉美裔。也没见绑一个名字叫Donald的。
查了下（现在AI真是方便），内华达州法律NRS 197.210似乎有可能给她定个Category D felony。那个川普就不能赦免了。
April 25, 2025 at 5:11 AM
查了下（现在AI真是方便），内华达州法律NRS 197.210似乎有可能给她定个Category D felony。那个川普就不能赦免了。
Exactly. Not before we overcome the U.S. Marshals Service under the Injustice Department.
April 11, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Exactly. Not before we overcome the U.S. Marshals Service under the Injustice Department.
Saw angry people.
Still missing an explanation of some major (say, top 3) *differences* of the previous CR vs shutdown. There are articles explaining both, but nothing comparing them (e.g., this and this are really bad and will happen if shutdown, but *will not happen* now the CR passes).
Sigh.
Still missing an explanation of some major (say, top 3) *differences* of the previous CR vs shutdown. There are articles explaining both, but nothing comparing them (e.g., this and this are really bad and will happen if shutdown, but *will not happen* now the CR passes).
Sigh.
April 3, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Saw angry people.
Still missing an explanation of some major (say, top 3) *differences* of the previous CR vs shutdown. There are articles explaining both, but nothing comparing them (e.g., this and this are really bad and will happen if shutdown, but *will not happen* now the CR passes).
Sigh.
Still missing an explanation of some major (say, top 3) *differences* of the previous CR vs shutdown. There are articles explaining both, but nothing comparing them (e.g., this and this are really bad and will happen if shutdown, but *will not happen* now the CR passes).
Sigh.
These are the people who are incapable of regretting and are willing to scalp Native Americans again.
March 27, 2025 at 12:11 AM
These are the people who are incapable of regretting and are willing to scalp Native Americans again.
Hope there will be one anywhere Republicans cancel their Town Hall.
March 26, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Hope there will be one anywhere Republicans cancel their Town Hall.
拜上帝教教徒。
March 26, 2025 at 12:38 AM
拜上帝教教徒。
Politics aside, I don't understand what mistake scientists made.
Did they not know the virus mutates twice per month? Did they underestimate how long it survives in humans? Did they not realize the virus "bounds in one specific group of people" (and, what characterizes that group?)?
Did they not know the virus mutates twice per month? Did they underestimate how long it survives in humans? Did they not realize the virus "bounds in one specific group of people" (and, what characterizes that group?)?
March 25, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Politics aside, I don't understand what mistake scientists made.
Did they not know the virus mutates twice per month? Did they underestimate how long it survives in humans? Did they not realize the virus "bounds in one specific group of people" (and, what characterizes that group?)?
Did they not know the virus mutates twice per month? Did they underestimate how long it survives in humans? Did they not realize the virus "bounds in one specific group of people" (and, what characterizes that group?)?
所以ICE抓人遣返的时候，各（深蓝）州的law enforcement不能阻止甚至逮捕ICE的人么？如果联邦法官判决可以遣返，那再放行。这样各州只是把这个执法的灰色区域给cover了，也没违反联邦法律吧？联邦宪法也没说，即使联邦行政机构违反联邦法院判决，各州仍然不能阻止吧？
March 17, 2025 at 10:39 PM
所以ICE抓人遣返的时候，各（深蓝）州的law enforcement不能阻止甚至逮捕ICE的人么？如果联邦法官判决可以遣返，那再放行。这样各州只是把这个执法的灰色区域给cover了，也没违反联邦法律吧？联邦宪法也没说，即使联邦行政机构违反联邦法院判决，各州仍然不能阻止吧？
各州交联邦所得税，承认美元美债，（处在美国边境的州）接受联邦的入境管理，这些都是宪法里的。那现在行政机构无视法院判决，深蓝州是不是可以自行决定还要不要遵守这些。
March 17, 2025 at 1:37 AM
各州交联邦所得税，承认美元美债，（处在美国边境的州）接受联邦的入境管理，这些都是宪法里的。那现在行政机构无视法院判决，深蓝州是不是可以自行决定还要不要遵守这些。