@e-m-forster.bsky.social
Yes. I didn't say it was illegal.
January 11, 2026 at 5:45 PM
Yes. I didn't say it was illegal.
It's plagiarism
January 11, 2026 at 3:17 PM
It's plagiarism
You have become too partisan. Unfollowed
January 8, 2026 at 4:49 PM
You have become too partisan. Unfollowed
You did not specify what you thought was obvious in this sentence bsky.app/profile/rich...
You may have meant that it was obvious that you didn't know who the article was about when you made your first comment. Is that correct?
You may have meant that it was obvious that you didn't know who the article was about when you made your first comment. Is that correct?
I thought that was obvious, but the post didnt make it clear, unless you click oin it, And that makes it a 'argument in absentia' Which means the information you are holding me responsible for was not brought into the discussion.
January 7, 2026 at 8:47 AM
You did not specify what you thought was obvious in this sentence bsky.app/profile/rich...
You may have meant that it was obvious that you didn't know who the article was about when you made your first comment. Is that correct?
You may have meant that it was obvious that you didn't know who the article was about when you made your first comment. Is that correct?
I do not know, your sentence didn't specify. That's why I'm asking.
January 7, 2026 at 8:37 AM
I do not know, your sentence didn't specify. That's why I'm asking.
You thought what was obvious?
January 7, 2026 at 8:33 AM
You thought what was obvious?
You thought what was obvious?
January 7, 2026 at 8:32 AM
You thought what was obvious?
I assume you're not talking about the Irish general election of 2024 that led Simon Harris to the office of Taoiseach. Perhaps it's time to admit that you mistook the subject of the Irish times article to be Kamala Harris.
January 7, 2026 at 12:28 AM
I assume you're not talking about the Irish general election of 2024 that led Simon Harris to the office of Taoiseach. Perhaps it's time to admit that you mistook the subject of the Irish times article to be Kamala Harris.
You will be lied to repeatedly by supporters. Your way is to abandon rational thoughts to the AI of the Internet.
January 7, 2026 at 12:11 AM
You will be lied to repeatedly by supporters. Your way is to abandon rational thoughts to the AI of the Internet.
To say someone isn't a fascist isn't supporting, it's accuracy.
January 7, 2026 at 12:10 AM
To say someone isn't a fascist isn't supporting, it's accuracy.
Who do you think I'm supporting?
You should get your news from reputable news sources.
You should get your news from reputable news sources.
January 6, 2026 at 10:58 PM
Who do you think I'm supporting?
You should get your news from reputable news sources.
You should get your news from reputable news sources.
We may. Simon Harris is neither a woman nor a fascist. You presumably have no idea who he is.
January 6, 2026 at 10:53 PM
We may. Simon Harris is neither a woman nor a fascist. You presumably have no idea who he is.
You've never heard Simon Harris being referred to as anything else but a woman? Kinda makes your claims of his motivations sound completely insane doesn't it.
January 6, 2026 at 10:40 PM
You've never heard Simon Harris being referred to as anything else but a woman? Kinda makes your claims of his motivations sound completely insane doesn't it.
An ambiguous pronoun isn't deadnaming. What reason did you have to believe that he was a woman?
January 6, 2026 at 10:32 PM
An ambiguous pronoun isn't deadnaming. What reason did you have to believe that he was a woman?
So the appropriate pronouns would be "they". Why are you commenting on the motivations of someone who you seem to know nothing about?
January 6, 2026 at 10:27 PM
So the appropriate pronouns would be "they". Why are you commenting on the motivations of someone who you seem to know nothing about?
You want me to try and find an example of Simon Harris referring to himself as a "he" ?
Here you go. He called himself a "proud Wicklow man"
www.finegael.ie/speech-of-th...
Now why did you decide to refer to him as a woman?
Here you go. He called himself a "proud Wicklow man"
www.finegael.ie/speech-of-th...
Now why did you decide to refer to him as a woman?
Speech of the Leader of Fine Gael, Simon Harris T.D., - Fine Gael
A dhaoine uaisle, a chairde, oíche mhaith agaibh go léir agus fáilte go Gaillimh. I am deeply honoured to address you this evening in Ollscoil na Gaillimh as I prepare to take on the greatest challen...
www.finegael.ie
January 6, 2026 at 10:21 PM
You want me to try and find an example of Simon Harris referring to himself as a "he" ?
Here you go. He called himself a "proud Wicklow man"
www.finegael.ie/speech-of-th...
Now why did you decide to refer to him as a woman?
Here you go. He called himself a "proud Wicklow man"
www.finegael.ie/speech-of-th...
Now why did you decide to refer to him as a woman?
You didn't "just ask" you referred to him as "her".
January 6, 2026 at 10:16 PM
You didn't "just ask" you referred to him as "her".
I'm sorry, why are you saying that Simon Harris is a woman?
January 6, 2026 at 10:00 PM
I'm sorry, why are you saying that Simon Harris is a woman?
Harris isn't a woman
January 6, 2026 at 9:20 PM
Harris isn't a woman
All the bots have voted against it already.
January 5, 2026 at 1:43 PM
All the bots have voted against it already.
There is no credible alternative. If we do nothing you will be getting AI influence over every element of your life and civil society. An AI of all the people you trust and love will sell you a new ideology and new shoes at the same time. All to the highest bidder.
January 5, 2026 at 1:07 PM
There is no credible alternative. If we do nothing you will be getting AI influence over every element of your life and civil society. An AI of all the people you trust and love will sell you a new ideology and new shoes at the same time. All to the highest bidder.
Yes. Social media has already been a massive disruptor to society. Add in AI and it destroys everything it touches. My freedom of speech is pointless when it can be drowned by a virtually endless amount of AI saying what the owners want us to hear. There will be no social cohesion.
January 5, 2026 at 12:50 PM
Yes. Social media has already been a massive disruptor to society. Add in AI and it destroys everything it touches. My freedom of speech is pointless when it can be drowned by a virtually endless amount of AI saying what the owners want us to hear. There will be no social cohesion.