We spoke with a company doing their second nature risk assessment. They aren't in scope for any mandatory or voluntary reporting. They just want to ensure that every decision puts them in a strong position to be resilient against climate change and biodiversity loss. They understand the assignment.

One of the hardest parts of nature risk assessment?
Location changes everything.

Generic risk ratings miss what matters: the specific ecosystems, natural resources, and species vulnerabilities where your operations actually sit.

Location-specific data isn't optional - it's foundational.

Nature-related financial risk is no longer abstract.

As biodiversity loss accelerates and frameworks like TNFD take shape, companies are expected to link ecological impact with financial decisions — often without location-specific tools.

That’s where most nature risk work breaks down.