I mean, he *thinks* he can continue to be as conservative as he wants. But he won't be able to test that belief until Canadians go to the polls, which is too late if he is wrong.

And we already know he's been wrong about *many* things.

Hilarious, even!

Wait a minute. It re-prompts and everything changes. None of the models can do it with any kind of consistency.

Wait, what? You're saying there are opposition parties? With leaders?!

I mean, I'd like to believe you, but I just haven't seen any evidence that could possibly back up that extraordinary claim.

I am now officially a single-issue voter.

A reminder that you can send feedback to YouTube directly from the app.

You > Settings > Send feedback

What's wild is that we had an election about this. Canadians understood this new dynamic and they elected the candidates who said they understood it, too, and would act accordingly.

And months later, here we are.

Can we also talk about the fact that the bridges only have sidewalks on one side?! Having to cross over and back makes walking so much less pleasant. I'm sure additional cost would've been a rounding error.

I've been thinking that a good promise would be to speed up streetcars (and future LRTs) on ROWs. Seems like an easy lift and hard to attack as "war on the car." It's enough lines that it would really make a difference, and maybe open people's eyes to what's possible on other lines, as well.

No pipelines or highways, please. Burning more carbon is not a path to the future.

Let's be a global research superpower. Leading American researchers are looking for new homes. Tell the premiers to stop starving our universities, and let's capitalize on the opportunity.

Sixty-forder suth inerth.

I don't know how you expect him to make it any clearer than that.

Wild headline. 3 or more infections is commonplace, and 30-37% Long COVID risk for that group seems catastrophic. Why wouldn't they lead with that?

That's what the majority of people in his district said!