What about the infinity of fallacious counterarguments? Have you carefully addressed each of those?

Koenig was in one of them too

"The idea that I'm a formal system leads to the conclusion that I'm one which can prove things Gödel says formal systems can't prove!"

"And by prove, you mean, like, deduce from your underlying axioms alone?"

"Well..."

"Uh-huh."

The question is when, how and IF we will ever be rid of the evil regime that will survive him.

Not what it says

Not where facts and logic usually lead, in my experience

We tried impeachment twice before.

But THIS time, we'll use ARTICLE 2, SECTION 4, which is a different form of impeachment (FACT CHECK: IT ISN'T) and removes the whole administration at once! (FACT CHECK: IT DOESN'T)

Hope unchecked by reason is the complacency which brought on all this madness--a very high price indeed

You can hope for something and still think it's unlikely...

'cause that was totally about Mickey Mouse off-year elections

9

A condiment but not the kindimeant

You have to understand MAGA logic.

All they need is a stupid way to say "same thing on your side!" (even if it's an obscure rumor about Andrew Jackson) and that means every complaint about their side can be dismissed as hypocrisy. Complaint dismissed = exoneration!

Yes, they really are that dumb.

It's called 'thumbing'

A very simple test of whether that's a no or a yes is to imagine "so, no" or "so, yes" following it.

Cassidy's words basically amount to "I'm such an unreflective dipshit that I don't even bother to THINK about it."

So, NO.

Also the fucking Breakfast Club

Everything in the past 30 years

We have no evidence / the odds say we should.

Kinda sounds like we "calculated" the "odds" based on crap instead of evidence, doesn't it?