"We found that the most effective strategies to motivate action to address climate change involved guiding people to think about future out comes, particularly for themselves and close others."

I hope its not confirmation bias on my part- this is what I intuited (especially for kin selection).

For more on dangers of SRM see: darrenrumbold.com/solar-geoeng...

If effective, SRM would undermine GHG reduction efforts and fuel an argument for continued burning of fossil fuels. The ‘fool’ would say “burn, baby burn.” Don’t forget increased atmospheric CO2 has another, possibly even greater, impact: ocean acidification, which could disrupt the Ocean C-sink

yes, it was supposed
to be were driving past

The risk of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection is if effective, decisions-makers would disregard the negative effects. Easy to envision Trump making the argument that SAI allows us to “burn, baby burn.” It does not reduce the atmo pool or reduce CO2 emissions so does not address ocean acidification.

www.scientificamerican.com/article/amid...

it is sad to read the comments on Facebook about what these attorneys are asking for - they miss the point : rule of law

Gabbard should have read www.defense.gov/News/News-St...