Tim Robinson
banner
drtimrobinson.bsky.social
Tim Robinson
@drtimrobinson.bsky.social
Consultant and senior lecturer in medical oncology, University of Bristol. Breast cancer, clinical trials and harm v benefit. Rides a bike sometimes
And, although I’m not at SABCS this year, why do we not have data on TILS from KN522?!
December 11, 2024 at 2:31 PM
Not at SABCS, but from afar there has to be some positive biomarkers from a trial where a significant minority don’t seem to benefit (in terms of pathCR at least) from treatment. More work needed!
December 11, 2024 at 10:56 AM
I should also add that regulators have a key role here and there are signs that requirements will change. We need to using prognostic biomarkers (eg path response) and balancing the harm versus benefit of these treatments for both patients and health care systems
November 28, 2024 at 9:26 AM
Same comment as on the other forum!
November 27, 2024 at 10:40 PM
I really like this paper and remember being impresssed when it was presented. Hats off to the authors!
November 27, 2024 at 7:31 PM
It’s the best CME there is. Shame you can’t claim the time!
November 27, 2024 at 10:42 AM
Certainly needs unpicking and hopefully the samples exist to do that. Did the trial contain a cytotoxic back bone? If not, I wonder if this is needed. Seemingly lots of potential but so far a complex story with anti-TIGIT molecules
November 26, 2024 at 5:41 PM
I’m at 2 rejections for what we feel is a practice changing study. One likely ‘out of scope’, 2nd too expensive and not enough evidence of community support (multiple surveys/patient focus groups backing). Hopeful plan c being made today but it is quite exhausting!
November 26, 2024 at 9:19 AM
Feel your pain. Can feel like a brick wall. But, celebrate your (very obvious) successes and remember you’re doing great and your research will make a difference!
November 26, 2024 at 8:10 AM
I’ll await my invite..
November 24, 2024 at 9:58 PM
Not attending this year sadly!
November 24, 2024 at 7:42 PM
Feel free to please add me Mike
November 24, 2024 at 7:26 PM
Indeed, also not without controversy I think due to AI results but more relevant than ever due to ⬆️ use. However, I’ve seen critiques of the adherence in the trial and ⬆️vaginal oestrogen doses used that are much higher than modern preparations. Always ➕/➖ when discussing with pts
November 23, 2024 at 7:40 PM
Bravo, great paper. Lots of emerging data for the PD1/TIGIT combo in the lab but data from lung trials has been disappointing. I hope that new strategies, with chemo or ADC backbones, may help circumvent this resistance. We know cytotoxics induce CSCs and it needs exploring
November 21, 2024 at 4:01 PM
ALSPAC in Bristol?
November 21, 2024 at 11:02 AM
November 21, 2024 at 9:43 AM