Given how he's a petulant manchild that gets emotional over the comments of a teenager girl, I'd say that even small s stoicism AND broicism is above him.
January 2, 2025 at 11:28 PM
Given how he's a petulant manchild that gets emotional over the comments of a teenager girl, I'd say that even small s stoicism AND broicism is above him.
>> my issue with the statement is that on one side I see the virtue of justice being incompatible with many policies, on the other that this kind of statement is so vague it can be said of pretty much any philosophy or political stance.
Thanks in advance for the correction if I misunderstood
January 2, 2025 at 11:03 PM
>> my issue with the statement is that on one side I see the virtue of justice being incompatible with many policies, on the other that this kind of statement is so vague it can be said of pretty much any philosophy or political stance.
Thanks in advance for the correction if I misunderstood
> so if that statement is true of parties it's even more true of philosophies. Anyway, I'll try steelmanning: what I understand you saying is that stoicism is compatible with any political stance and at best may require to take into account the wellbeing of ppl involved. >>
January 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
> so if that statement is true of parties it's even more true of philosophies. Anyway, I'll try steelmanning: what I understand you saying is that stoicism is compatible with any political stance and at best may require to take into account the wellbeing of ppl involved. >>
Firstly, this is a "learn aloud" account I have. If anything, thank you for teaching me. Secondly, I'm sorry if my tone is off, this is my second language, I lose a lot in translation. Third(ly? Is it a thing?) parties usually are more stringent on policy than philosophies. >
January 2, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Firstly, this is a "learn aloud" account I have. If anything, thank you for teaching me. Secondly, I'm sorry if my tone is off, this is my second language, I lose a lot in translation. Third(ly? Is it a thing?) parties usually are more stringent on policy than philosophies. >
by that standard ... not even being a card carrying party member would entail any particular policy per se... so what'the point you are trying to make? The vaguest truism?
January 2, 2025 at 6:14 PM
by that standard ... not even being a card carrying party member would entail any particular policy per se... so what'the point you are trying to make? The vaguest truism?
Bertrand, a great thinker but I don't think he saw himself a stoic. He wrote: "There is, in fact, an element of sour grapes in Stoicism. We can't be happy, but we can be good; let us therefore pretend that, so long as we are good, it doesn't matter being unhappy. 1/2
December 31, 2024 at 11:31 PM
Bertrand, a great thinker but I don't think he saw himself a stoic. He wrote: "There is, in fact, an element of sour grapes in Stoicism. We can't be happy, but we can be good; let us therefore pretend that, so long as we are good, it doesn't matter being unhappy. 1/2
It's all fine and dandy, but at some point you have the ideal of justice and some dude saying he wants to deport/murder millions. It's clear that he cannot hold that and be a stoic in any sense. So stoicism definitely does entail some politics.
December 31, 2024 at 7:30 PM
It's all fine and dandy, but at some point you have the ideal of justice and some dude saying he wants to deport/murder millions. It's clear that he cannot hold that and be a stoic in any sense. So stoicism definitely does entail some politics.