[4/4] In sum: Both systems exhibited implicit sequence-specific learning after 3 days of practice, demonstrating that eye movements contribute to implicit motor sequence learning. However, the two systems were not always coordinated, suggesting a dynamic relationship.

[3/4] When examining the relationship between the two systems during practice, we found that reaches were typically faster when preceded by faster-latency (express) saccades. And the magnitude of implicit sequence-specific performance was correlated between the systems, but not always!

[2/4] ...and relatively permanent changes in behaviour, as assessed at a delayed retention test. Notably, saccades were more sensitive to repeated movements and required less practice to exhibit sequence-specific changes.

[1/4] We tracked saccades and arm reaches across 3 days of practice and at a delayed retention test, allowing us to distinguish improvements related to practice from more lasting changes associated with motor sequence learning. Saccades, just like arm reaches, showed sequence-specific improvements..

@lboyd47.bsky.social

I'd like to be added! Thank you

I'd like to be added!

I would like to be added! Thank you

Meet Zephyrus, recent UBC graduate, and BSc in Canine Critical Thinking!