Justin Lackey
drmanbun.bsky.social
Justin Lackey
@drmanbun.bsky.social
EM —> Critical care. Aspiring Guytonian. EBM for everything but ketamine because the world’s greatest drug doesn’t need to prove anything to you
Again try avoid CPRing if possible so low end and say 20 which feels right.
December 5, 2025 at 11:00 PM
When I ask Open Evidence to use the old Swan studies to give an average stroke volume for patients with septic shock and severe heart failure it gives average of 60-80 mL and 40-60 mL respectively so let’s take that at face value and rate you would need to generate that would be 15-30.
December 5, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Assuming your only possible intervention immediately is CPR I think it turns into a math problem. Exact CO of CPR not known but about 30% pre-arrest output. Since not technically dead and don’t want to compress unnecessarily let’s give benefit of doubt and say CO of CPR is max 1200 mL (30% of 4 L).
December 5, 2025 at 11:00 PM
That one might be worse because you don’t know what it should be and some plurality to majority don’t know what it means

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12065369/
Pulmonary artery catheter: does the problem lie in the users? - PubMed
The aims of this study were to look for the variability in the treatment of circulatory shock and to assess the extent to which this variability was reduced by pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC). At three international conferences in 1997-1998 (European Society of Critical Care Medicine, French …
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
November 6, 2025 at 9:10 PM
If you take patients in shock and take out the ones who definitely need an arterial line is there a mortality benefit to only putting them in the ones who maybe need it? Does it help that no one really knows what number you want that arterial line to more accurately show?
November 4, 2025 at 8:59 PM
What difference would there be between a profoundly vasoplegic patient with poor venous return or a patient with a poorly visualized and nearly akinetic right ventricle and the hypovolemic patient?
September 1, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Something that has never made sense to me, if objective measures of end-diastolic area have not worked out as good predictors of recruitable cardiac output then why would there be any validity in saying “meh looks a little empty”?
September 1, 2025 at 11:27 PM
I think the best feature of EPIC is that the urine output is yellow. Something intensely satisfying about it
September 1, 2025 at 9:18 PM
So what happens when it’s indefinitely trended?
August 27, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Good point, but I would typically think of these as significant variation over minutes to hours rather than significant swings across seconds
July 12, 2025 at 9:19 AM
July 12, 2025 at 12:49 AM
You are basically left with some cause of significant (LV) preload variability: cardiac tamponade, large shunt, significant hypovolemia. What else is missing, either mechanistically or clinically? @pulmcrit.bsky.social @load-dependent.bsky.social @zentensivist.bsky.social
July 12, 2025 at 12:48 AM