Keith Smith
@drkeithsmith.bsky.social
PhD, occasional astronomer, talking head, science geek, cynic. Senior Editor at @Science.org, responsible for research papers in astronomy and planetary science. Views own, duh. Bio: https://www.science.org/content/author/keith-t-smith
‘The Good Will Out’ album by Embrace?
October 30, 2025 at 10:37 AM
‘The Good Will Out’ album by Embrace?
‘Green open access’ means the authors’ accepted manuscript is publicly available, without needing a subscription or membership. See
open-access.network/en/informati...
The authors choose which repository to put it on; popular choices include arXiv and PubMed Central.
open-access.network/en/informati...
The authors choose which repository to put it on; popular choices include arXiv and PubMed Central.
Open Access Green and Gold
Open Access Gold means the original publication as an OA article or book, Open Access Green refers to the self-archiving of texts or data in a repository.
open-access.network
October 25, 2025 at 6:58 PM
‘Green open access’ means the authors’ accepted manuscript is publicly available, without needing a subscription or membership. See
open-access.network/en/informati...
The authors choose which repository to put it on; popular choices include arXiv and PubMed Central.
open-access.network/en/informati...
The authors choose which repository to put it on; popular choices include arXiv and PubMed Central.
(There is an *optional* colour printing fee for authors, but that can be avoided by providing black & white figures. There are waivers for authors in developing countries. If authors choose to pay, it works out as less than the cost of a typical paper in major astronomy journals ApJ, MNRAS etc.)
October 17, 2025 at 11:30 AM
(There is an *optional* colour printing fee for authors, but that can be avoided by providing black & white figures. There are waivers for authors in developing countries. If authors choose to pay, it works out as less than the cost of a typical paper in major astronomy journals ApJ, MNRAS etc.)
Reposted by Keith Smith
Please don't vandalise @wikipedia.org. It's one of the most useful resources ever produced. Don't deliberately damage it.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
October 7, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Please don't vandalise @wikipedia.org. It's one of the most useful resources ever produced. Don't deliberately damage it.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
Please don't vandalise @wikipedia.org. It's one of the most useful resources ever produced. Don't deliberately damage it.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
October 7, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Please don't vandalise @wikipedia.org. It's one of the most useful resources ever produced. Don't deliberately damage it.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.
You might think you're just having a laugh, but you're making the encyclopaedia worse for everyone else, and wasting the time of other users who have to tidy up after you.