Sam Driscoll
driscmetrics.bsky.social
Sam Driscoll
@driscmetrics.bsky.social
Just a regular dude who is pissed off with the state of society.

Wanted to inspire social change but realised I'm not sure on how to actually inspire anything.

Fuck.
nypost.com/video/sickos...

Not the same videos fed to me by my algorithm but they're of a similar nature - although somewhat tamer.
Sickos cheer Charlie Kirk’s death following horrific assassination
Influential conservative activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a campus speaking event in Utah. While many social media users expressed their heartbreak and horror at Kirk’s passing, …
nypost.com
September 16, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Our algorithms are obviously calibrated differently then as I was force fed several videos of liberal people celebrating his death. Which seems painfully ironic to me.

I never consumed his content but what I saw never struck me as hateful. But I wasn't a fan so I didn't pay much attention.
September 11, 2025 at 9:27 AM
This made me laugh, I've used the favourite ice cream metaphor several times when trying to explain the nuance of therapeutic compatibility - and I couldn't agree more!
July 7, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Congratulations on submitting the final manuscript!

I found the 1st edition pivotal in helping me to develop and define my values as a person-centred therapist in an evidence-based world.

I look forward to getting the 2nd edition!
July 5, 2025 at 11:32 AM
If that makes sense?
March 1, 2025 at 1:26 PM
That sounds useful!

For me, I'm aware who I am is so dependent on context that I cannot ever be a fixed thing.

The environment has such a significant impact on self-expression for me.

Therefore I find I can be most things at different times but never all the things at the same time...
March 1, 2025 at 1:26 PM
I tend the exchange 'I am' with 'I can' - I am nothing but I can be lots of different things.

I am feels so rigid to me, whereas I can be feels more expansive and allows more space for growth and development.
March 1, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Again, you don't respond to any of my points... this is such a confusing interaction for me to make sense of...

I just don't understand your intention, I've been truthful to my experience of this interaction and my apologies if you found my experience painful.

Take care
February 27, 2025 at 10:41 PM
I really don't know, but this feels like anything but a conversation being conducted in good faith tbh.
February 27, 2025 at 10:06 PM
And then you use the metaphor of how the whole topic feels like holding water in your hands when having these discussions with white people and men. Have you considered what the constant is in all of those conversations? Perhaps you have difficulty in listening to points you disagree with?
February 27, 2025 at 10:06 PM
I'm also confused how you appear to have symbolised my genuine answers as challenging what doesn't feel right... I'm purposely owning my own experience and not challenging anything. Seems like yet another conflation.
February 27, 2025 at 10:06 PM
As someone passionate about oppressed/oppressor dynamics, I'm surprised that you seem unaware of the power dynamics between question asker and question answerer.
February 27, 2025 at 10:05 PM
You also say, "I just don't get why it's hard at all if we go into these conversations asking rather than challenging as soon as something doesn't feel right."
February 27, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Two points to that: I never made a point about a group needing to do anything about me feeling safe... Plus, there's clearly undertones here - I acknowledge the sense of an agenda, suggest you reveal it, and you ignore my point.
February 27, 2025 at 10:03 PM
For reasons unknown, you ask about my experiences of being in groups, and I answer in good faith - then you asked a fairly pointed question "has anyone ever shared all the reasons why they won't bother to do what would make you feel safe?"
February 27, 2025 at 10:03 PM
There's some confusion with my sun metaphor, I explain it explicitly, and then you disclose your misinterpretation and ask me if I didn't mean it the way you interpreted it - literally right after I've explicitly described what I meant.
February 27, 2025 at 10:02 PM
You make a fairly wild accusation how I've listed many reasons tegarding my resistance to acknowledging difference and what comes with it, yet when I ask you provide one example, you don't, plus you don't apologise for conflating my points.
February 27, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Hmmm, interesting turn of events - so you believe you've entered this conversation in good faith then?

If so, why have you cherry picked your responses and purposely conflated what I've said?
February 27, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Have you misconstrued what I've been saying on purpose?
February 27, 2025 at 7:40 PM
My feeling is similar to what you say but not quite - feels like I'm missing a piece of a puzzle.

The sun was a metaphor for an encounter that risks rupture - which has the potential to be harmful when a r/ship hasn't been developed which can then be repaired. And I didn't say I was staring at it
February 27, 2025 at 7:40 PM
And your question feels like there's an agenda underneath it, if you have a point to make please feel free to speak freely...
February 27, 2025 at 7:39 PM
I'm confused. I've no problem with acknowledging difference, not sure I've said that anywhere yet you've heard many reasons - please feel free to highlight where I've said that and I'll discuss further.
February 27, 2025 at 7:38 PM