No. The algorithm DP is very useful. I want to be angry at the algorithm because of noise in census data, but the algorithm itself is stupidly useful.

Pretty much, yep.

Thanks Valerie!

Thanks! Yea the winning paper looks incredible!

Thank you!

Thank you!🙏

Sadly I don’t have a Bluesky thread over here and I’m a little loath to link the thread from the other place.

Thank you Mary! 🙏

It’s really bad everywhere. I know I’m not the only one looking for greener pastures.

I’m not sure AI is a bubble. It’s bubble-like in that there’s lots of snake oil but the underlying core tech is here to stay. We can talk more about it at PAA.

Haha!

The understated athleticism of the ninjabread man, the tasteful googly eyes, the artful smattering of sprinkles. Masterpiece.

So the meme is both right and wrong and it is incumbent upon us to ensure that we are on a low emissions pathway, ensuring that older generations have peak lifetime carbon emissions.

We also decompose the contributions changes in population size and age-specific emissions rate in changing cohort emissions. It is the age-specific emissions that drive most of the changes in cohort emissions rather than cohort sizes.