All numbers are Unlinked Passenger Trips, the numbers of passengers that board. Service Area Population is reported by the transit agency

Here's the raw data for these years for SeaTac, with all agencies and modes:

The ride numbers are the same as the ones you used, summed across all agencies in the UTZ.
Data source here:
www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/data-pro...

data from here:
www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/data-pro...

Posted this on the original thread- the ride per capita is flawed. The FTA posts UPT per agency and groups by UPZ. If you divide by the UPZ population, the per capita rides are not equally represented. But if you divide by agency service area they are weighted the same.

Here's the daily rides of the top 10 UTZ corrected for service area population:

But the UTZ UPT includes rides from both agencies. If you divide by the total UTZ population (for Sea_Tac: 3,354,011) they are not equally represented in a per capita ride.

The FTA does include a "Service Area Population" that can take into account the fact that agencies within the UTZ serve a smaller population. For example Seattle_Tacoma includes both King County (service area population 2,372,800) and City of Everett (service area population 111,180).

In Seattle, thanks

Miami not scheduled to play until the 13th.

Turning the existing field into a dual use football/soccer field will definitely draw the ire of rec and club soccer players. It is heavily used for youth and adult practice and games.

Will they keep Stuart back from the U23 camp until after the game Sunday?

JMo's escalator was metrics over 2 years (2022-2024). If JF is on the same then there is a 2-year period before having to solve this problem?

I found too many down sides - wet pants, way too sweaty from covering rain pants - not to change. I've found changing out of bike tights is the way to go. Perhaps if I had an electric bike things would be different

Thank you. You will be missed!

And who started the fire?