what if both nazis and anti-nazis are present at the bar. what type of bar is it in that case? It's weak logic to go "these people are present here, therefore that's the established philosophy of the establishment"

if this is true, then how do you stay/live IN AMERICA? the idea that a place that has a certain group automatically endorses a certain group is very weak reasoning. I saw a racist at the grocery store, does that make the store a racist grocery store?

it's a dilemma: twitter has lots of fun shit, but the politics is 90%+ rightwing (+bots!) and it creeps in.
bluesky has lots of leftwing shit, it's like 90%+ leftwing (naturally without botting), but there's hardly any fun shit otherwise!

you could've done that on twitter too, muting the nazis that harsh the vibe. of course, you may never know that, you muted this lol ironic

twitter is fine if you only want celebs and anime and sports and pop culture stuff. but once you let the algorithm know you're interested in politics, the TL is flooded with like 90% rightwing cranks/bots, and it ruins the experience.

I honestly doubt it makes much of a difference. Twitter/X surpresses non-right thought/speech anyway. Show me the lefty still on that platform that's relevant and increasing their impact specifically bc of twitter. I'll wait.

I'm not so sure the "nazi bar" anlogy works when you can curate your own exp, block, mute, etc. But I still wouldn't blame anyone for leaving that platform.

The questionis "is it or is it not contritutionally required to seek congress approval for war? what is the understanding of this white house?" and if they say he'll "make a decision" you reply "to be clear, he'll 'decide' whether or not to follow the constitution? is that optional to you guys?"

I think that claim is full of shit. You're the same guy who claimed (lied) that people of color were eatingpet dogs and cats in Ohio just to get a rise out of your racist nazi fan base. So forgive me if I don't trust you. Post your sources rather than throwing out bullshit engagement bait.

you're clearly a trolling POS, the medical experts have made the case clearly that these are good procedures that save lives. We're supposed to listen to sleepy uncle Thom and the MAHA with their bs chatgpt reports over places like Harvard? lol fuck off.

The issue is if you say something is "corrupt" or "a crime", but there's no investigation, no arrests, no court trial, no evidence, no arguments or debates, no *LEGAL PROCEDURAL* reaction, then ppl will stop believing it's a crime.

"Oh I'm a criminal? I'm corrupt? SUE ME THEN BITCH" met w/ nothing

Let's make note of which side is winning and has been getting their policy priorities (evil and stupid tho they may be) addressed.

This is true and I agree, but at the very least make the rules clear enough that it's not a question or a debate when someone runs afoul of them. One of the issues with the USA is that the rules are so loose that half the "crimes" aren't really crimes.

no Degrassi is a shame, but....
no interest in having a history making #1 music artist for an interview??? does he still do interviews?

oh well, it's not like he has a podcast or anything, right?

Not really. He could be replaced with any of the GOP goons and it'd be roughly the same thing. The GOP as a party and political movement, entrenched laws and voters all, needs to flatline.

We won't know for sure until the Dems get another chance to aid and abet a genocide. If they reflect back on this moment and choose not to, the protest vote will have worked out (plus a bonus of less genocide! yay!!).

If they don't, would you still be mad at the voter??

The Dems even dabble in rightwing! Then you have Centrists who want to find compromise between the KKK and Civil Rights groups. Selfish zombies that only care about their personal taxes. Then you have the Far Right: party of slavery and racism (and idiocy). A home for pure American evil.