Do you take drogna?
@doyoutakedrogna.bsky.social
Escaped the other place. Bit goth. Disabled. Loves photography, horses, board/card games, being an annoying intersectional feminist killjoy, and holographic nail polish. 🏳️🌈myself; 🏳️⚧️ally. Learning 🏴
Reposted by Do you take drogna?
“The wellbeing of claimants, not cost savings, needs to be at the heart of any reforms,”
Absolutely right. Why can we not see welfare spending as socially valuable, the right thing to do, the hallmark of a decent society. Not a failing or an "unsustainable" burden on society.
Absolutely right. Why can we not see welfare spending as socially valuable, the right thing to do, the hallmark of a decent society. Not a failing or an "unsustainable" burden on society.
Overhaul ‘unsustainable’ incapacity benefits system, Lords committee urges
Peers call on Labour to carry out ‘fundamental review’ amid rising concerns over retention of Tory plans for £3bn in cuts
www.theguardian.com
January 20, 2025 at 1:12 PM
“The wellbeing of claimants, not cost savings, needs to be at the heart of any reforms,”
Absolutely right. Why can we not see welfare spending as socially valuable, the right thing to do, the hallmark of a decent society. Not a failing or an "unsustainable" burden on society.
Absolutely right. Why can we not see welfare spending as socially valuable, the right thing to do, the hallmark of a decent society. Not a failing or an "unsustainable" burden on society.
Reposted by Do you take drogna?
‘Benefit’ = ‘something intended to help’
‘Cracking down on benefits’ = ‘cracking down on things that are intended to help’
‘Cracking down on benefits’ = ‘cracking down on things that are intended to help’
November 25, 2024 at 10:34 AM
‘Benefit’ = ‘something intended to help’
‘Cracking down on benefits’ = ‘cracking down on things that are intended to help’
‘Cracking down on benefits’ = ‘cracking down on things that are intended to help’
Reposted by Do you take drogna?
Important context here:
● over half of farms are less than 49 acres (20 hectares)
● "a big farm" is 217 acres.
Now let's see who's angry:
● Clarkson farm is 1,000 acres
● Lloyd Webber farms 4,000 acres
● Viscount Rothermere (Mail owner) 4,700 acres
● Dyson owns 36,000 acres
● over half of farms are less than 49 acres (20 hectares)
● "a big farm" is 217 acres.
Now let's see who's angry:
● Clarkson farm is 1,000 acres
● Lloyd Webber farms 4,000 acres
● Viscount Rothermere (Mail owner) 4,700 acres
● Dyson owns 36,000 acres
A message from a REAL farmer who hasn’t been brainwashed by the Tories, wealthy landowners and the right wing media👇🏽
#FarmersProtest
#FarmersProtest
November 20, 2024 at 7:36 AM
Important context here:
● over half of farms are less than 49 acres (20 hectares)
● "a big farm" is 217 acres.
Now let's see who's angry:
● Clarkson farm is 1,000 acres
● Lloyd Webber farms 4,000 acres
● Viscount Rothermere (Mail owner) 4,700 acres
● Dyson owns 36,000 acres
● over half of farms are less than 49 acres (20 hectares)
● "a big farm" is 217 acres.
Now let's see who's angry:
● Clarkson farm is 1,000 acres
● Lloyd Webber farms 4,000 acres
● Viscount Rothermere (Mail owner) 4,700 acres
● Dyson owns 36,000 acres