Fair. ChatGPT has no incentive to keep people from asking silly questions.

I like (1) in that it is clear about what it is trying to test but that's also irrelevant to me. Just because a good chunk of users asks silly questions doesn't invalidate the software. As for (2), all questions work consistently that prompt the software to provide considerations for a problem.

I would also add that there are plenty of use cases where it's not about giving "correct" answers at all.

Plus, that can't possibly be the best alternative they could have come up with...

Sure. But they also fail the statistics exam, so mixed messages on how much faith we should place in them...

Man kann Pepe mit einer Excel-Datei incentivieren...

I don't know. I'm just assuming that it would be lower but I have no sense by how much.

Presumably, Tesla is no small part of the US auto-making sector? So, wouldn’t we want to know how much the sector is down without Tesla being part of that figure?

Investment Bankers are a thing, ya know?

Sam halt nur noch auf Polymarket…

You’re right, of course and I should have been more specific. What I meant was that it’s the most self-explanatory symbol that doesn’t occurred naturally.