I'm curious what the reasoning is for dismissal. The prosecution literally has a recording of Fortenberry being told the money was illegal. It's a pretty airtight case.

I just asked an AI to name some Marriott hotels in Georgia with a gym that would cost less than 50000 points. It gave me five results with an option to get more details on each, so I suppose that's one scenario.

It does not meet the test of " a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary and has been determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. "

One more note on this - the resort/destination fees are charged by hotel owners, not the franchise brand (Marriott, Hilton, etc) unlike Ticketmaster that keeps those fees and the venue and artist doesn't. Owners got hammered by COVID, and this was their way to make up the revenue gap.

Thanks for your reply. I'm interested to see how it may automate tasks, as you mentioned, and if developments can overcome those complexities you pointed out. If companies see any efficiency gained, they'll happily pay for these bundled products from MS365, but how much is the question now.

I have seen mixed reports about how AI investments may or may not be profitable for companies like Google and MS. Can you explain why you feel it cannot be profitable in this case?

The reasoning is "...enhances mentoring, learning, brainstorming ...accelerates decision-making and offers valuable opportunities for spontaneous learning and creativity ...early career professionals to learn through our apprenticeship model and expand their networks by building connections"