gag the advocate and impose costs. wonder how the appeal will go.

marks a significant shift in social risk. politicisation is an appropriate response

have seen a bunch of stuff from all sorts of people including her. haven’t seen her scamming for money tho, so can’t quite see the grift. wondering if i haven’t quite grasped the meaning of “grift”

ahh
hadn’t seen it that way…
so what do you think her grift is?

haha no
think that’s at least part of what sue grey was doing

no one ever said that testing the boundaries of free speech would be easy 😊

classic orators

laying the foundations for a lifetime of learning

or crazy for that matter

probably missed something as usual

curious about how advocating for sovereignty over one’s own health choices, which appeared to be what sue grey was on about, counts as hateful

ah, so one of the three branches of government …

may have misunderstood your point, but seems pretty clear she’s right to say “government” … www.parliament.nz/en/get-invol...

was a pretty close result in nz’s 2020 referendum… maybe the pro-lobby groups have had sufficient time to push that agenda. political processes aren’t cheap, the news is full of the hard drug pedlars making gains, weed could be the lesser of a bunch of evils … so maybe you should test the waters

apparently nz govt has accepted ms murfitt’s application for a citizens initiated referendum on nz exiting the who.

a step toward health sovereignty.

how refreshing.