Dan Ohnemus
dohnemus.bsky.social
Dan Ohnemus
@dohnemus.bsky.social
Savannah-based oceanographer. linktr.ee/capecodnative
Any trace metal folks used non-metal needles for clean sampling? Hamilton sells PEEK ones but they’re $40/each!
August 18, 2025 at 1:51 PM
New favorite German word I’ve learned, “verschlimmbessert”—to make something worse with so-called improvements. So many examples in academia!
August 16, 2025 at 6:21 PM
If you plot dFe vs dAl from the GEOTRACES IDP, you get a horse.
April 14, 2025 at 4:45 PM
(6/n) Science/research offers a unique opportunity for innovation focusing on content that is (at least ideally): a) self-evident (if presented properly!), and b) independent of the authors. It would require significant effort to set aside our egos from the scientific processes too.
February 5, 2025 at 4:33 AM
(5/n) Relatedly, reviewing and editorship would be interesting to consider from a trust standpoint. Are editors entrusted with the identities of the authors and/or reviewers to assist in verification of their credentials? Is that even necessary if the science is self-evident?
February 5, 2025 at 4:27 AM
(4/n) … meaning authors who are not being suppressed or conducting “taboo” research to _elect_ use of the system to dilute the pool for those suppressed authors and topics.
February 5, 2025 at 4:24 AM
(3/n) I’d be interested if folks know of relevant comparisons and/or lessons from the real world. Author-blind peer review comes with many of its own challenges, and not all research is well suited to secrecy of the authors. Such a system would also greatly benefit from “sympathetic adoption”…
February 5, 2025 at 4:22 AM
(2/n) Such a system would provide plausible deniability for suppressed authors until they chose to show ownership. Such a system might even come with fairer reviews given its anonymity requirements. There are numerous complications and considerations, of course, so flexibility would be important.
February 5, 2025 at 4:21 AM
In our new age of speed-run fascism and crypto, suppressed research should be publishable under mixed-privacy credentialing. We have the tools to create an article submission system where author(s) can _eventually_ claim credit for their articles using private keys—think NFTs for research.
1/n
February 5, 2025 at 4:20 AM
My snow boots were literally dusty
January 23, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Snowvannah
January 22, 2025 at 7:33 AM
A white power, nazi salute at an American inauguration. Twice. Be disgusted and be saddened by your countrymen. But stop being surprised!

Be thankful they’re showing who they are—without veils or hesitation. Because in the face of this naked hatred we too can stand up when needed without hesitation
January 20, 2025 at 11:24 PM
In honor of the passing of David Lynch—a spoof ad showing his disdain for the cheapening of his art
David Lynch on iPhone
YouTube video by Brittney Gilbert
youtu.be
January 16, 2025 at 7:48 PM
January 9, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Also dusty:
January 8, 2025 at 11:53 PM
We got a paper published! (And I already found some problems with it!) If you want to figure out how much dust MERRA-2--an atmospheric reanalysis product--thinks was over your study site, you can use the tools linked in the article or on my GitHub: doi.org/10.1029/2024...
github.com/capecodnativ...
January 8, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Firing up my bsky account with some content (con-quinnt?) re-posted from another app. Here's to a future filled with more authentic interactions.
January 8, 2025 at 11:23 PM