dodecahedonist.bsky.social
@dodecahedonist.bsky.social
"Less robust" is very different than what you initially implied, and also your guesses on the size of the effect are speculative at best. The effect would still be there, though, and "it'll mean more customers, just less than 10% of the TAM" isn't a strong counterargument in my book.
December 26, 2025 at 12:16 AM
There are 25 million uninsured right now.
December 25, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Except that distinction isn't true, since there are ~25 million people who are currently uninsured who would be able to pay for health care. How is that materially different than the situation that happened with medicare?
December 25, 2025 at 11:32 PM
How many people who currently dont have usable insurance would have it on M4A? You're acting like the same effect that happened with Medicare wouldn't also happen here.
December 25, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Uh oh, you might have to wait for that one chief.
December 14, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Give me 2700k or give me death
December 6, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Out of curiosity, how does that calculus work in places that aren't as sunny as CA?
December 4, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Im not sure your graph proves your point as thoroughly as you imply, but I'm clearly behind on the cost/ viability of large scale battery usage.
December 4, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Currently, energy storage methods don't exist that would allow solar to become the stable baseline on the grid. We still need something that isn't variable in its production, and nuclear is the best option for that.
December 4, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Just call me... the guy from *Numbers*
November 13, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Erdös number is just your position in the drug hierarchy. Sort of a mathematical Stringer Bell.
November 13, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Crucially, Sears ran an enormous number of anti-trans ads, and it helped her not at all. So again, it's not necessary to throw them under the bus to win, and in fact it's pure cowardice to suggest it.
November 6, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Perhaps, instead of the story you told yourself about why Kamala lost, there was a different reason!
November 5, 2025 at 5:10 PM
It's almost as if those issues aren't actually what drives voters. What a fuckin' revelation, you don't have to throw trans people under the bus to win elections.
November 5, 2025 at 5:10 PM
It didn't help them win in these recent elections. Maybe you should learn from that.
November 5, 2025 at 5:04 PM
I'm saying that focusing on trans women in sports is just... not important. It doesn't matter in any real way, at the college or high school level. And the fact that you think it needs to be "FORCEFULLY" rejected speaks to the fact that you're taking talking points from propaganda, not reality.
November 5, 2025 at 1:44 PM
You need remedial English if you can't parse what I said. Good luck walking and breathing at the same time.
November 5, 2025 at 1:28 PM
You're getting your "median voter" talking points from it, whether you realize it or not. And imagine being a pedant about the name of the Nazi website, what a fuckin' dweeb you are.
November 5, 2025 at 1:21 PM
It isn't, get off Twitter and stop pretending that's a representative sample.
November 5, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Cherry picking topics that are mostly niche issues? How about instead of forcefully rejecting them, we just focus on shit that actually affects the majority of people's lives? You're just a weird little guy who doesn't like trans people, and is pretending that's actually what anyone cares about.
November 5, 2025 at 1:17 PM
You've got a warped sense of how Nuremberg went. Only 161 people were convicted in total, that's hardly an expunging of the street-level goons. A handful got made examples of, thousands got off without any consequence.
October 26, 2025 at 1:15 PM
You're the poster child for credulous idiots.
October 24, 2025 at 9:46 PM
You can believe he didn't know about it or learn about it for 18 years? As a self professed WW2 buff? I have a bridge to sell you.
October 24, 2025 at 9:45 PM