at least as the sole mechanism, so LLMs are participating in this human enterprise without the full scope of human cognitive capacity... it’s almost easier to imagine each AI model as a strange individual human with their own personality quirks w/r/t linguistic behaviors.

LMAO wow, ok — yes these two names are very helpful in understanding this table of contents

Yeah, or if I’m shaking a dog’s hand / paw. I’m actually good calling it either of those in that situation, but not foot. Lol

My current method is to grade them with the same rubric and just make sure to penalize AI misuse just as I would other kinds of factual or structural errors. I also let them know if they write something they don’t want to read, I don’t want to read it, either.

Ok, so here’s a question. I have an undergrad course, I assign my students a 500-word response paper. They are allowed to use AI as long as they disclose AI. Should the AI and non-AI papers be graded with the same, or a different rubric?

Depends on what they're up to.