D&D and Dogs
@dndanddogs.bsky.social
I like D&D and dogs. Roll for initiative.
Congress can’t pass laws that override or limit the President’s constitutional pardon power, but Congress can impeach, convict, and remove the President for abusing that power. Whether Congress will choose to do so at some point is a different question.
January 17, 2026 at 5:52 AM
Congress can’t pass laws that override or limit the President’s constitutional pardon power, but Congress can impeach, convict, and remove the President for abusing that power. Whether Congress will choose to do so at some point is a different question.
It’s also not like the legal secretary is typing out the sig block by hand each time. There should be a master pleading template that gets re-used. To have a typo in the sig block is insane.
December 19, 2025 at 7:41 AM
It’s also not like the legal secretary is typing out the sig block by hand each time. There should be a master pleading template that gets re-used. To have a typo in the sig block is insane.
Not a problem that hiring another Vice Provost for Special Gifts can’t solve.
December 18, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Not a problem that hiring another Vice Provost for Special Gifts can’t solve.
It’s view from nowhere nonsense. They’re unwilling to apply law to fact to reach a conclusion, even though the law, the fact, and the conclusion are all obvious and undisputed.
December 12, 2025 at 6:00 AM
It’s view from nowhere nonsense. They’re unwilling to apply law to fact to reach a conclusion, even though the law, the fact, and the conclusion are all obvious and undisputed.
“hardened cocaine ideologues,” lol
December 5, 2025 at 6:40 PM
“hardened cocaine ideologues,” lol
Burning cash in a dumpster is one of Trump’s true skills.
November 12, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Burning cash in a dumpster is one of Trump’s true skills.
Yes. But it’s a zombie misstatement that will never die.
September 24, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Yes. But it’s a zombie misstatement that will never die.
Republicans believe Dems who fight back are unfair rule-breakers.
August 21, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Republicans believe Dems who fight back are unfair rule-breakers.
An agreement to break the law is a conspiracy. I don’t understand what type of reliance defense you have in mind.
August 10, 2025 at 1:56 AM
An agreement to break the law is a conspiracy. I don’t understand what type of reliance defense you have in mind.
Schumer “going quasi-edge-lord.” Lol, I love it.
August 6, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Schumer “going quasi-edge-lord.” Lol, I love it.
Doesn’t Trump have to dangle the pardon to keep her quiet, then issue it as he leaves office? If he does it now, and the Dems take back the House, it seems like they could force her to testify w/o 5A concerns. She could flee the country forever, I guess.
July 25, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Doesn’t Trump have to dangle the pardon to keep her quiet, then issue it as he leaves office? If he does it now, and the Dems take back the House, it seems like they could force her to testify w/o 5A concerns. She could flee the country forever, I guess.
It’s not the worst part of the result, but the Supreme Court also is teaching the Government that following lower court orders is optional.
June 24, 2025 at 5:31 AM
It’s not the worst part of the result, but the Supreme Court also is teaching the Government that following lower court orders is optional.
Mescaline is the only way to fly.
June 1, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Mescaline is the only way to fly.
“These heartland residents expressed shock and dismay when Carol, their friend and neighbor of 20 years, was disappeared by the President they elected. Now, two weeks later, the same residents uniformly report they don’t give a fuck about Carol and fully support the President who disappeared her.”
June 1, 2025 at 1:23 AM
“These heartland residents expressed shock and dismay when Carol, their friend and neighbor of 20 years, was disappeared by the President they elected. Now, two weeks later, the same residents uniformly report they don’t give a fuck about Carol and fully support the President who disappeared her.”
Agree, we’ve seen this story 100 times, and they portray the townspeople as good-natured folk. Where’s the story explaining that two weeks later the (white) townsfolk have forgotten about Carol because they never cared about her in the first place? Screw the townsfolk and their furrowed brows.
May 31, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Agree, we’ve seen this story 100 times, and they portray the townspeople as good-natured folk. Where’s the story explaining that two weeks later the (white) townsfolk have forgotten about Carol because they never cared about her in the first place? Screw the townsfolk and their furrowed brows.
Hot comment thread. [tumbleweed rolls by]
May 31, 2025 at 10:52 AM
Hot comment thread. [tumbleweed rolls by]
I love TPM, but this is a bad headline. The Court’s approach is the judicial equivalent of a sternly worded letter from Schumer. The Court could have issued an OSC re contempt, but it chose to do basically nothing. The Court’s inaction in the face of blatant contempt is the story.
May 30, 2025 at 9:10 PM
I love TPM, but this is a bad headline. The Court’s approach is the judicial equivalent of a sternly worded letter from Schumer. The Court could have issued an OSC re contempt, but it chose to do basically nothing. The Court’s inaction in the face of blatant contempt is the story.
“More than one person” = AI.
May 28, 2025 at 4:38 PM
“More than one person” = AI.
Where is Schumer’s strongly worded letter about this?!
April 28, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Where is Schumer’s strongly worded letter about this?!
Someone should tell Comer that some asshole is signing his name to stupid letters.
April 21, 2025 at 12:14 AM
Someone should tell Comer that some asshole is signing his name to stupid letters.
When I subscribe to DirecTV, I don’t have to pay to put my own satellite in the air.
April 19, 2025 at 11:55 PM
When I subscribe to DirecTV, I don’t have to pay to put my own satellite in the air.