I'm telling you, Binghamton: tech hub

Are the non-ProQuest EEBO images comprehensive? Could they be OCRed?

I've also come to see the opening explicit statement of "here's what I think you're saying" as critical as well. Authors really benefit from knowing whether what they thought they said is what people actually read.

Most of the time, Computational Humanities applies NLP tools designed for other contexts. In Chap 3, @dbamman.bsky.social explores what happens when we design NLP for humanities from the start:

dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/com...

“Stop trying to make smart glasses happen. It’s not going to happen.”

I see this as mostly determined by choice of advisor? I can predict accurately how a paper will land at *ACL, but we needed lots of advice from friends to have any chance at CSCW.

And yes, this is my commute

In Chap 2, Mark Algee-Hewitt urges us to think of interpretation as a recurring cycle, where we are challenged by tools to reimagine our objects of study.

>>> [ord(c) for c in "Al"]
[65, 108]

once again a task that can be solved trivially with one line of python