David Passmore
banner
dlp2pgh.bsky.social
David Passmore
@dlp2pgh.bsky.social
Dents with Meaning
there was a chorus of people saying exactly that
November 18, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Also who gets "taught" here? DeSantis? Kushner? Stefanik? What is even happening?
November 18, 2025 at 9:07 AM
I'm beginning to wonder if any "teaching" happens at Harvard or similar places. Or do these people just occupy seats of importance and refuge, basking in the glow of immense privilege?
November 18, 2025 at 8:57 AM
Question: why did you believe this?
November 18, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Don't hold your breath
November 18, 2025 at 8:42 AM
Yep. In fact, it works over and over. The real distraction is from the fact that he has no policies for the American people that don't hurt them immensely.

Epstein files will never come out unless they are leaked
November 18, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Win "congress" - House and Senate, right? With 2/3 majority in Senate?
November 17, 2025 at 9:38 PM
State election interference that they want to do
November 17, 2025 at 9:34 PM
If you want to help clear the fog on this, help people understand that the "investigation" DoJ has started will be the next stage of not releasing files, protecting Trump. So his call to make them public only serves to take pressure off of him personally, because they "can't" make them public.
November 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Some can do more, some less. Has to do with varying amounts of privilege.
November 17, 2025 at 5:40 PM
He only needs to shift the blame and give MAGA a reason to move on, which they will readily take.
November 17, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Calling for release takes the pressure off of Trump. It will satisfy his cultists.

Simultaneously opening a new Epstein investigation via Bondi allows them to drag their feet more.

Old trick: "I can't release my taxes, they are being investigated". It works for him
November 17, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Pelosi succeeded in impeachment on both occasions. She passed solid articles of impeachment and sent them along. Blaming her is goofy. Her impeachments were conducted correctly and they moved on to the Senate.
November 17, 2025 at 12:36 AM
So please explain why they were failures, as you claim?
November 16, 2025 at 8:03 PM
A simple majority vote in the House defines the outcome of an impeachment.
November 16, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Let's get back to my question. Do you understand that the last three presidential impeachments succeeded? Y/N?
November 16, 2025 at 7:44 PM
The single argument against beginning an impeachment today is that it will fail because Trump's cult controls the House. There you have it.
November 16, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Impeachment *articles. Please take more time to read and understand here.
November 16, 2025 at 7:42 PM
The last three presidential impeachments have not failed. They have all succeeded. You understand this, right?
November 16, 2025 at 7:31 PM
LOL! So in this exchange, you're the one that deserves to introduce nuance and have it be considered, not anyone else.
November 16, 2025 at 7:30 PM
You clearly don't understand this. The question of many impeachment articles vs a few has already been decided by numerous experiences.
November 16, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Thanks for telling me, with assurance, what my plan is. You don't even need to ask me, you can just tell me. Your perceptive capacity is truly impressive.
November 16, 2025 at 6:24 PM