Statcast xwOBA doesn't exist prior to 2015, so it's only for his 2016 playoff appearance.
October 21, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Statcast xwOBA doesn't exist prior to 2015, so it's only for his 2016 playoff appearance.
That’s a 403 forbidden error. We have had serious problems with bots in the past couple months and when it’s impacting site usability we’ve had to block all automated traffic. It’s not permanent and you should typically be able to try again in a couple hours and it will work.
September 18, 2025 at 5:05 AM
That’s a 403 forbidden error. We have had serious problems with bots in the past couple months and when it’s impacting site usability we’ve had to block all automated traffic. It’s not permanent and you should typically be able to try again in a couple hours and it will work.
This is a bit of a mystery on our end too. I'm going to have to ask our image provider about it.
May 5, 2025 at 2:18 PM
This is a bit of a mystery on our end too. I'm going to have to ask our image provider about it.
Sorry, made a mistake here. For 2024 Coors is .99. Diamondbacks with roof open is 1.14, so Coors is definitely a lot lower. I was looking at an adjusted air density calculation that doesn't give a correct picture.
February 26, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Sorry, made a mistake here. For 2024 Coors is .99. Diamondbacks with roof open is 1.14, so Coors is definitely a lot lower. I was looking at an adjusted air density calculation that doesn't give a correct picture.
Average air density for 2025 games in AZ (measured near Chase) is considerably lower at 1.141 than the average at any park location during game time in-season. Lowest is 1.173 and that's Chase and that's only when the roof is open.
February 26, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Average air density for 2025 games in AZ (measured near Chase) is considerably lower at 1.141 than the average at any park location during game time in-season. Lowest is 1.173 and that's Chase and that's only when the roof is open.
Since you brought it up, what is worse about the site and is there anything you think has improved?
February 18, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Since you brought it up, what is worse about the site and is there anything you think has improved?
"We don’t participate in SEO schemes." 👍
February 5, 2025 at 3:31 PM
"We don’t participate in SEO schemes." 👍
That's very kind of you, but please do log-in. There's lots of great Member features and you can't get your custom year end FanGraphs Walk-Off if you don't log in. It's also just a better experience in general.
January 30, 2025 at 8:30 PM
That's very kind of you, but please do log-in. There's lots of great Member features and you can't get your custom year end FanGraphs Walk-Off if you don't log in. It's also just a better experience in general.
The playing time projections change regularly. Was there some specific change you were looking for, or trying to figure out if we made?
January 28, 2025 at 3:45 PM
The playing time projections change regularly. Was there some specific change you were looking for, or trying to figure out if we made?
Thanks for your support! You shouldn't be seeing any ads as a member. If for some reason you are, send a note to support@fangraphs.com and I'll take a look to see what the problem is.
January 23, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Thanks for your support! You shouldn't be seeing any ads as a member. If for some reason you are, send a note to support@fangraphs.com and I'll take a look to see what the problem is.
Yes, pitchers have their own framing metric which is part of FanGraphs WAR.
December 18, 2024 at 10:06 PM
Yes, pitchers have their own framing metric which is part of FanGraphs WAR.
It's a hidden feature, but it can be done by adding &age=b2000,1998 to a leaderboard url. This would show players born between (and including) 1998-2000.
December 5, 2024 at 7:34 PM
It's a hidden feature, but it can be done by adding &age=b2000,1998 to a leaderboard url. This would show players born between (and including) 1998-2000.