Unlikely to be that long distance if they were just noticed by the airport. Same for the ones in Oslo. We'll just have to await real info

Godt at noen passer på

Takk for presiseringen 🫶

The free world is forever in Ukraine's debt.
Слава, слава, слава!

Errata: of course €1000 per Norwegian citizen. There are millions of us, not thousands 😅

Whose security report outlines one single ideal investment in the security of Norway: The victory of Ukraine. 8/8

B. We want the oil fund to be a guarantee of future generations' prosperity.
One might say that future generations would benefit from not having to learn russian whilst living in a totalitarian Norvegi Oblast, but you shouldn't take my word for it. Take instead the word of our military. 7/8

A reasonable concern to guard against. If we spend a lot in Norway we will see wages and prices rise too quickly and overheat our economy. Will this happen if we build power stations and drone factories in Ukraine? Absolutely not. Our economies are just not that tightly linked. 6/

So what is holding Norwegian Ukraine spending back? Firstly we have to talk about handlingsregelen. This is the rule that limits, by norm, what a Norwegian government spends of the oil fund. There are principally two reasons for it.
A. Spend too much, get inflation. 5/

Investment in Ukrainian victory is not an exercise in altruism. We are direct beneficiaries of ruzzian defeat, because we share a border with the terrorist state. Our security is dependent on a weakened or unwilling ruzzia, and unwilling is not on the menu, as empires have no borders.

The estimates vary, but good indications show that we may have increased our sovereign wealth fund by between € 150 billion and €200 billion since the beginning of the full scale invasion. At which point the € 5 billion increase looks already far less impressive. And yet it must be added: 3/

We are one of very few countries that has seen economic gains from ruzzia illegally invading its peaceful, democratic and sovereign neighbour. This is largely in terms of increased demand for oil, but especially gas. Obviously countries in Europe have had increased demand for gas of non-ru origin 2/

I had no idea he was autistic 😱

Hvis du tenker på Georgetown Women in Politics spørreundersøkelsen så var formuleringen av spørsmålet "Tell me if you agree or disagree with this statement: Men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women," altså menn er bedre skikket, ikke kvinner er uskikket. Har det noe å si?

Hvem sier at kvinner er for emosjonelle for å styre? Det eneste argumentet jeg har hørt for at kvinner er underrepresentert i ledelse er at de velger det bort