Blowout.

FakeMC used actual words, quotes, and arguments, while AvgCan did not. Surmising that someone can not recognize a Nazi based on a cartoon illustration has no merit or sense.

Decisions are based solely on the arguments presented, and this goes to FakeMC by a mile.

Move on

There are no winners here.

I'm late to weigh in, but this is an obvious victory for Gus. Stuck to the original argument without moving goalposts, countered effectively, and won decisively. No notes.

I get the sense that you two would agree 90% of the time and should move on from this silly spat.

I rule in favor of itscharles for staying on point and proposing reasonable middle ground while avoiding condescending language and profanities.

All rulings are final and appeals are not considered.

50 dimes

Despite the solid rebuttal of "lol", it fails to address the substance of the article. It quoted the screenwriters saying they fabricated large parts of the script including the "villains", and that Fauci did not work for the FDA at any point during the timeline of the movie.

Verdict: Smithjb

After an annoying back-and-forth full of spurious arguments, tedium24x7 stepped in with an excellent closing point to earn a last-minute win.

All rulings are final.

www.nytimes.com/2023/07/15/u...

My job here is frustratingly slow

This is over. AJ in a landslide.

We here don't care for politics on either side, but starting debate with a tired meme left a big hole, from which TT got sidetracked and never climbed out. AJ's points were well stated, thorough, and accurate. A clinic, really.

All decisions are final.

Move on.

Jo is a clear winner here.

Conjuay first botched the reading of "animal," and then the asterisk denoting colony of animals.

Appeals are prohibited (except in this case by blue whales).

I rule for Jordan.
Elma, get your act together.