Creating poll taxes on groups like married women isn’t an elegant, sensible, or democratic solution—regardless of the scope of the problem is. The common sense line is giving Laurel Libby vibes. What about common decency? Shame on you, Jared.

Wouldn’t it be wild, if gun rights supporters and bodily autonomy rights supporters were actually both allied constitutionalist? Because bodily autonomy is right there in the 14th amendment. Not under due process either. Crazy bedfellows, hypothetically.

I’m most interested in solving problems and having productive conversations. It’s great to air out our beliefs. I’m tired of the stale mate of arguing and banging out head against the wall. The problem is gun terror in schools- I’m interested in common ground and solutions.

Arming teachers is crossed off the group project solutions list here. So what else do we have in our bag of tricks to fix the problem?

Yeah, that’s common ground. Now what do we do while we wait a couple generations? Just live in terror? Any other ideas that fit within your belief structure? Because it keeps coming down to there is a problem but one group doesn’t like any of the current solutions. And for the sake of productivity,

Not comparable. 18th-century rifled muskets fired 2–3 rounds/min with limited accuracy (effective up to 100 yards), yielding low lethality. Modern automatic weapons fire 600–1200 rounds/min with high precision and power, vastly increasing their kill rate and potential for mass casualties.

You have proposed absolutely nothing tangible that would fix the problem. You have made a lot of passionate counter points to regulating guns. If I have missed your tangible proposals to stop the gun terror in American schools, please, you have the floor:

I disagree. The constitution doesn’t say “no.” Nor could the founders have imagined the level of weapons we have no - or the ability to 3D print. It’s time we contextualized the world we live in, find common ground, and move forward together with solutions that honor all of us.