Your sponsors are as dangerous as it comes. Bobby is a nice guy, and you’re a failing blowhard.

Yes, an argument made based upon a personal attack is an ad hom, especially when either provably false or otherwise when completely unverifiable.

www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/21/t...

Mud sling much, pornographers?

That is something you might expect an extremely wealthy group of non-Chinese to say.

Does the Spanish version sound any more poetic?

Making up passages changes things too, often horrifically.

The Anunnaki, after all, are sky people, and that is something of which every pilot at least, should be aware.

They have bigger problems acknowledging the Anunnaki. Are we going to suggest correcting those too, since those are of even greater societal importance? Maybe we can require that before anyone learns anything else at all?

Do it now, while you still can.

I absolutely didn’t. When you study something on your own, you do it to learn the truth. When the government mandates you study something, it’s either directly materially useful for your job or propaganda.

Switzerland was supposed to have good protections. What the hell happened?

What is strange to me is that many politicians, presumably such as yourself, find people that look different but think the same. Shouldn’t the test of a good politician be someone that can catch the admiration of a wide swatch of viewpoints? And the antidote is cooperative action, not community.

The other 37% probably are very rich or benefit from someone whom is.

Just give everyone a rifle, like Switzerland.