diliberg.bsky.social
@diliberg.bsky.social
(7/n) Great work from Sara Carta, in close collaboration with co-supervisors Alejandro Lopez Valdes, Emina Alickovic, Johannes Zaar. Thanks to Demant Fonden, Eriksholm Research Centre, @researchireland.ie for your support!
July 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
(6/n) Here we also looked into envelope tracking vs. lexical processing, and investigated how lexical context is updated during an attention switch.
July 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
(5/n) Indeed, there are lots of considerations that we discuss. For instance, the cortical tracking doesn't go to zero after a switch, as unattended streams are processed to an extent. (e.g., elifesciences.org/reviewed-pre...).
Get the gist of the story: Neural map of topic keywords in multi-speaker environment
elifesciences.org
July 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
(4/n) This phenomenon might be key to our ability to explore other conversations (before switching) while listening to a given speaker
July 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
(3/n) We found a clear asymmetry in this transition, with the engagement starting much earlier than the engagement. This leads to a brief moment where both speakers are encoded in the human cortex.
July 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
(2/n) The intuition is quite simple. When switching from a speaker A to a speaker B, the cortical tracking of A and B should decrease (disengagement) and increase (engagement) respectively. That's one key principle that BCIs for auditory attention decoding have been using
July 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Reposted
inspired by all the brilliant work from auditory visual processing and groups from @cnspworkshop.bsky.social
May 22, 2025 at 11:29 AM