Silver Birch
@dickp.bsky.social
And shortly after, arrives here. You're on quite a short fuse, aren't you? You might consider whether it was yourself I was criticising.
November 19, 2025 at 4:52 PM
And shortly after, arrives here. You're on quite a short fuse, aren't you? You might consider whether it was yourself I was criticising.
BTW, in checking whether intemperate had an 'o' in it, I collected my own example of AI's inability to count:
October 22, 2025 at 3:35 PM
BTW, in checking whether intemperate had an 'o' in it, I collected my own example of AI's inability to count:
You reposted this earlier today. Why are you sitting in the tiresome camp?
Until you can specify what risk teans women (not 'bad actors' or 'activists' pose to other women, you have no argument.
Until you can specify what risk teans women (not 'bad actors' or 'activists' pose to other women, you have no argument.
October 17, 2025 at 5:58 PM
You reposted this earlier today. Why are you sitting in the tiresome camp?
Until you can specify what risk teans women (not 'bad actors' or 'activists' pose to other women, you have no argument.
Until you can specify what risk teans women (not 'bad actors' or 'activists' pose to other women, you have no argument.
From that picture I can conclude that gammon is a filter. So now you're a gammon 😉
May 4, 2025 at 8:46 PM
From that picture I can conclude that gammon is a filter. So now you're a gammon 😉
Thanks for the link. It includes this correction. Perhaps you should post it on each of the places where you provided misinformation.
April 9, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Thanks for the link. It includes this correction. Perhaps you should post it on each of the places where you provided misinformation.
This you?
The whole article is based on the premise that they are government reformers, albeit terrible ones. They would describe what they're doing as reform. It isn't.
The whole article is based on the premise that they are government reformers, albeit terrible ones. They would describe what they're doing as reform. It isn't.
February 9, 2025 at 10:07 AM
This you?
The whole article is based on the premise that they are government reformers, albeit terrible ones. They would describe what they're doing as reform. It isn't.
The whole article is based on the premise that they are government reformers, albeit terrible ones. They would describe what they're doing as reform. It isn't.
Should have gone to Specsavers
November 30, 2024 at 9:51 AM
Should have gone to Specsavers