DHSaucepan
@dhsaucepan.altgov.info
Career civil servant in immigration.
That is all either normal language used in legal documents, or legal terms. Additionally, evidence is not submitted with a charging document. However, it is required at later stages, pre-trial.
But those are terms commonly used as they r from statute or have legal reason.
But those are terms commonly used as they r from statute or have legal reason.
June 10, 2025 at 3:48 AM
That is all either normal language used in legal documents, or legal terms. Additionally, evidence is not submitted with a charging document. However, it is required at later stages, pre-trial.
But those are terms commonly used as they r from statute or have legal reason.
But those are terms commonly used as they r from statute or have legal reason.
Yes. But state specific-& crucially-for ppl in specific situations or w/ specific needs. They make up such a minuscule portion of that state’s Medicaid. Some cases, single digit %. It’s some states, not every state. Most undoc don’t qualify.
Ppl that have coverage r the *exception*.
Ppl that have coverage r the *exception*.
June 7, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Yes. But state specific-& crucially-for ppl in specific situations or w/ specific needs. They make up such a minuscule portion of that state’s Medicaid. Some cases, single digit %. It’s some states, not every state. Most undoc don’t qualify.
Ppl that have coverage r the *exception*.
Ppl that have coverage r the *exception*.
YES! Several million undocumented ppl (approx 13 mil undocumented total, so a portion of that) pay taxes. As tax payers, they pay for services like Medicaid, Medicare, etc, exactly as you said 👆. But they don’t get it. USC kids can, but not them! But they pay for it!
June 6, 2025 at 4:14 AM
YES! Several million undocumented ppl (approx 13 mil undocumented total, so a portion of that) pay taxes. As tax payers, they pay for services like Medicaid, Medicare, etc, exactly as you said 👆. But they don’t get it. USC kids can, but not them! But they pay for it!
It is extremely stressful. Russell Vought is doing exactly what he wanted across the entire workforce: causing trauma. To everyone. In every agency.
June 3, 2025 at 5:05 AM
It is extremely stressful. Russell Vought is doing exactly what he wanted across the entire workforce: causing trauma. To everyone. In every agency.
Dont understand this and it’s not funny or amusing. It’s quite awful actually and in very poor taste.
June 3, 2025 at 5:03 AM
Dont understand this and it’s not funny or amusing. It’s quite awful actually and in very poor taste.
Yeah. Yeah they are. Let that sink in. They are showing up to court, just like they are supposed to.
May 30, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Yeah. Yeah they are. Let that sink in. They are showing up to court, just like they are supposed to.
Misnaming, oversimplifying, whatever-it will not help & it will not serve to correct or stop this. Not harping u-see this alot so saying this for everyone. Accuracy counts. Naming what it is matters, cause that’s how we can stop it.
May 30, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Misnaming, oversimplifying, whatever-it will not help & it will not serve to correct or stop this. Not harping u-see this alot so saying this for everyone. Accuracy counts. Naming what it is matters, cause that’s how we can stop it.
1. Virtual hearings are offered in some cases. It’s as needed, but it’s at courts discretion.
2. This is not “kidnapping”. It is a lawful arrest and processing for expedited removal.
But-it is also (imo) unconstitutional deprivation of due process under 5A.
It needs to be named. Held accountable.
2. This is not “kidnapping”. It is a lawful arrest and processing for expedited removal.
But-it is also (imo) unconstitutional deprivation of due process under 5A.
It needs to be named. Held accountable.
May 30, 2025 at 10:52 PM
1. Virtual hearings are offered in some cases. It’s as needed, but it’s at courts discretion.
2. This is not “kidnapping”. It is a lawful arrest and processing for expedited removal.
But-it is also (imo) unconstitutional deprivation of due process under 5A.
It needs to be named. Held accountable.
2. This is not “kidnapping”. It is a lawful arrest and processing for expedited removal.
But-it is also (imo) unconstitutional deprivation of due process under 5A.
It needs to be named. Held accountable.
Major change in data after 5/21-like, say, in absentia orders rising exponentially compared to prior weeks/months-is good “evidence” of causation.
But…guess we’re focusing on the word “concrete” then? 😑
But…guess we’re focusing on the word “concrete” then? 😑
May 30, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Major change in data after 5/21-like, say, in absentia orders rising exponentially compared to prior weeks/months-is good “evidence” of causation.
But…guess we’re focusing on the word “concrete” then? 😑
But…guess we’re focusing on the word “concrete” then? 😑
“I think it’s really just in the initiative stage,” he said. “So I don’t have any concrete evidence to show one way or the other.”
There’s this little thing called the docket. Info like no. of in absentias orders can be viewed/compared b/twn days….
There’s this little thing called the docket. Info like no. of in absentias orders can be viewed/compared b/twn days….
May 30, 2025 at 10:46 PM
“I think it’s really just in the initiative stage,” he said. “So I don’t have any concrete evidence to show one way or the other.”
There’s this little thing called the docket. Info like no. of in absentias orders can be viewed/compared b/twn days….
There’s this little thing called the docket. Info like no. of in absentias orders can be viewed/compared b/twn days….