Will this provide better safety to the people because of giving police 24/7 access to the traffic cameras in Surrey or does this create a long-term surveillance system that violates the privacy of people?

Would the interest of national security be sufficient to prohibit foreign surveillance technology, even when these companies do not provide the government with control and that prohibition restricts the competitiveness of the market?

Do temporary surveillance cameras installed for major events like the 2026 World Cup meaningfully improve public safety, or do they normalize increased surveillance in public spaces at the expense of privacy?

I disagree, It could also lead to bias and unfair targeting of certain groups.

I disagree, while AI facial recognition might help identify suspects, the risks to privacy and potential for biased outcomes could harm innocent people and erode public trust, so it shouldn’t be used without strict oversight and safeguards.

Yes, police should be allowed to use AI-powered facial recognition if it is strictly regulated, transparent, and limited to serious public-safety needs, with strong safeguards to protect privacy and civil liberties.

Should police use AI facial recognition on body cameras despite privacy, bias, and civil-liberties concerns?

I agree that American tech companies should be held accountable when their technology enables mass surveillance and repression.

I agree that U.S. tech companies should be held accountable because they often know their technology can be used for mass surveillance and human rights abuses.

I agree that they should be held legally accountable.

“Should countries limit the export and use of advanced surveillance technologies to protect civil liberties?”