Denis
@dhabig.bsky.social
fantasy football data analyst using data from over 20 Experts and other sources to build a meta-modell for the upcoming rookie classes
That bodes very well for Hunter as a later pick in my rookie drafts!
May 4, 2025 at 7:25 AM
That bodes very well for Hunter as a later pick in my rookie drafts!
He has a strong speed score but even in JJs ZAP score he is only average at best. But according to your DLF and PFF markers he is in a pretty good list and RB who according to these stats have a high probability of becoming a good NFL and fantasy RB. This gives you a good overall picture of a player
May 4, 2025 at 7:25 AM
He has a strong speed score but even in JJs ZAP score he is only average at best. But according to your DLF and PFF markers he is in a pretty good list and RB who according to these stats have a high probability of becoming a good NFL and fantasy RB. This gives you a good overall picture of a player
The best example: Jarquez Hunter. He's only a third-round pick. But he's a fourth-round pick. That's why in Ryan and Scott's SPORQ model, respectively, you see a relatively low probability. My calculations on Aaron's backcast and recindex paint the same picture.
May 4, 2025 at 7:25 AM
The best example: Jarquez Hunter. He's only a third-round pick. But he's a fourth-round pick. That's why in Ryan and Scott's SPORQ model, respectively, you see a relatively low probability. My calculations on Aaron's backcast and recindex paint the same picture.
For example, if the past success rate for player type A is 60% in evaluation model 1, but 30% in model 2 and only 10% in model 3, then it may be easier to predict the output than if you only use model 1 as a criterion.
May 4, 2025 at 7:16 AM
For example, if the past success rate for player type A is 60% in evaluation model 1, but 30% in model 2 and only 10% in model 3, then it may be easier to predict the output than if you only use model 1 as a criterion.
I think it makes a lot of sense to think in terms of ratios and probabilities, because no player has a 100% or 0% probability of becoming a successful NFL player or fantasy player. The truth lies somewhere in between.
May 4, 2025 at 7:16 AM
I think it makes a lot of sense to think in terms of ratios and probabilities, because no player has a 100% or 0% probability of becoming a successful NFL player or fantasy player. The truth lies somewhere in between.
e.g. data from @lateroundqb.bsky.social @backseatscout.bsky.social @dynastynerds.bsky.social @mbfantasylife.bsky.social @fantasypoints.com @aaronschatz.com @footballguys.com @profootballfocus.bsky.social @fantasyfootballers.bsky.social @dynastyleaguefootball.com @amazehayes.bsky.social and more
April 30, 2025 at 6:12 PM